User talk:FanOfG&P

Read WP:CONSENSUS, WP:NPOV, WP:NPA and a bunch more policies before you go calling others trolls for doing what their supposed to. And don't revert at List of WWE World Heavyweight Champions again. oknazevad (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Roadblock (2016)


A tag has been placed on Roadblock (2016) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 15:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Roadblock (2016) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roadblock (2016) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Roadblock (2016) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 23:58, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of WWE pay-per-view events, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Don't add events until they have been confirmed by the WWE and can be sourced to the WWE's website. Sceptre (talk) 15:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of WWE pay-per-view events, you may be blocked from editing. Sceptre (talk) 16:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

It's not vandalizing, i'm putting the correct info.

July 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Randy Orton, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ~Lord Laitinen~ (talk) 22:03, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Reliable sources
See WP:PW/RS for a list of reliable sources for professional wrestling. Avoid those not listed as reliable.LM2000 (talk) 22:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Your recent editing history at Paige (wrestler) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. LM2000 (talk) 22:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Seth Rollins July 2016.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Seth Rollins July 2016.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Prefall 13:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC)