User talk:FanaticDreamer

Welcome!
Hello, FanaticDreamer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- 🐦DrWho42 ( 🔨 ) 22:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LKHObsidianButterfly.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LKHObsidianButterfly.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Obsidian Butterfly
Hey, I appreciate people writing up content; we all do, as well, I'm sure. What we don't like is people writing up a whole bunch of unverified and possibly unencyclopedic material and then saying "well other shit is unverified too"--because that is crap. It is not our job to fix EVERY single article before we can critique yours. So, I suggest you add some reliable secondary sources soon to prove that this book warrants an article per our guidelines, and that you refrain from invalid arguments. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I looked up the guidelines and nothing says I cannot add a novel for an author that already has a majority of her novels listed. If there are a bunch of novels for her listed, a majority without references I might add, then there should be no problem here. There are several gaps of information that I am trying to rectify. I am in the process of adding more references for not only the article I added but for the others without references, too. It feels arbitrary to be targeted for adding to the website. FanaticDreamer (talk) 22:27, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * This is not about your feelings; if you're going to look things up, Other stuff exists is of interest. Of course the guidelines aren't going to say what you think is a reason for having this up; you can find the notability guidelines for books here, Notability (books). Drmies (talk) 22:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)