User talk:Fanboi123

October 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ruthin School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. It is also vastly inappropriate for you to claim you're fixing errors while engaging in this behavior. DonIago (talk) 19:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ruthin School, you may be blocked from editing. Dorsetonian (talk) 19:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ruthin School. Dorsetonian (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ruthin School. Bad sources and failure to remain neutral are not going to help your cause. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dorsetonian (talk) 22:57, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Ruthin School
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Fanboi123 (talk) 08:11, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * 

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 10:54, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 11:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

appeal the block
In addition to the edit-warring - which is not addressed in the above appeal - I have also had to delete most of your edits from the article's history due to blatant copyright violations. You will need to address both of these issues in any future unblock appeal. Yunshui 雲 水 11:57, 10 October 2019 (UTC)