User talk:Fancy vibēs

Review for the block
Fancy vißes ( call ) 16:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Open a SPI investigation or Checkuser test against my account and other wrongly linked accounts
Technical and behavioural match to at the very least. That account is obviously unambiguously confirmed to. At this point, I stopped looking. I have no reason to doubt the other checkusers here. --Yamla (talk) 20:57, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Any reviewing CU is welcome to email me to request details about the technical connection. Girth Summit  (blether)  01:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Yamla Users will only be labeled as sock puppets of prior users if they have participated in earlier modifications of the same page. Not even they alter a page's content, adding or removing the identical information. This implies that your account will be associated with a blocked editor who may have previously altered the same three or four pages if just one blocked editor was involved. However, after reviewing and clarifying every publicly available log history, I was able to demonstrate that my account did not correspond with any incorrectly linked accounts, such as Anuj Choudhary Ror, AnujRor, or Balwant Chopra.
 * For Transe and Dance, 3 or 4 pages matched, but this still did not show me a sock of Transe and Danse or any other users, so I don't know why anyone is still not trying to hear me, only other admins, just saying we stand with Girth Summit. No problem to stand with Girth Summit or your colleagues, but isn't it still unfair to label me a sock with Transe Ænd Dance because I reverted some edits on the same pages where Transe Ænd Dance was involved? Is this my crime? Well, to be honest, I have proved by providing all public logs that my account is not matched with AnujRor, Anuj Choudhary Ror, Balwant Chopra, For Transe Ænd Dance, I made some reverts on pages where Transe Ænd Dance was involved or made edits, so Yamla, this proves me a sock.? Here are some examples that still proove i am not a sock of these wrongly linked accounts this is not fair with millions of common users on Wikipedia there is a great loop and mistakes some admins wrongly linking and blocking many innocent users please see for Fancy vibēs vs Balwant Chopra see (|for Fancy vibēs vs Balwant Chopra see), for Fancy vibēs vs AnujRor see (| fancy vibēs vs AnujRor),
 * for Fancy vibēs vs Anuj Choudhary Ror see
 * (| Fancy vibēs vs Anuj Choudhary Ror)

I am not a sock of these wrongly linked accounts, but not a single admin wants to hear my voice. Girth Summit might be thinking of me as a bad person or considering it disrespectful to his actions, and other admins may also think and stand with Girth Summit, but I am a common user. I have nothing to do with any respectable admins or their actions, but I just tried to prove I am not wrong. So far, I have proved it by giving evidence from Wikipedia's investigation tools and proving I am not a sock of their wrongly linked blocked accounts, and for Transe and Danse, I am not even a sock to this account because I reverted some edits where this user, Transe and Dance, was engaged in major or small edits, which still doesn't prove me a sock. Fancy vißes ( call ) 23:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @BlablubbsBlablubbs Fancy vißes  ( call ) 00:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You have no access to the tools that were used to link this account to . You have asked another user below to stop pinging you in all their unblock requests - I suggest that you stop pinging the administrators who have declined your unblock requests. We know that you are the same person who used the Transe Ænd Dance account, and you know it too: this charade is embarrassing, and a waste of everyone's time. Girth Summit  (blether)  21:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Don't ping me
Rawna Praveen singh solanki Kindly don't ping me in your all unblock requests. This is very irritating for me. Fancy vißes ( call ) 00:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

I am not a sock there is a great loop and mistakes
@Yamla, @Blablubbs ''These evidences are still not enough to prove that I have not been involved in using multiple accounts and I am not a sock of these all four blocked accounts. Three accounts have evidence to clearly prove my stand, and one last account, Transe Ænd Dance, only matches because I just made small reverts of changes where this account, Transe Ænd Dance, was also involved in major or small edits, but it still does not prove me a sock when other three accounts with evidence have already proved that I am not familiar with these accounts. I hope so you people believe in the results of this Wikipedia's investigation tool.?'' [https://interaction-timeline.toolforge.org/?wiki=enwiki&user=Fancy%20vib%C4%93s| This tool (www.interaction-timeline.toolforge.org) prooved my stand that these accounts are not matching with my account still any admin don't want to see evidence if these evidences are not reliable then it mean Wikipedia investigation tool where I have generated these evidence made mistakes.? Or only God will believe on my honesty.?]

for Fancy vibēs vs Balwant Chopra see (|for Fancy vibēs vs Balwant Chopra see), for Fancy vibēs vs AnujRor see (| fancy vibēs vs AnujRor), for Fancy vibēs vs Anuj Choudhary Ror see (| Fancy vibēs vs Anuj Choudhary Ror). Fancy vißes ( call ) 00:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Girth Summit I will not ping other users or admins further, but you can please check these three wrongly linked accounts—two linked because of you, including AnujRor and Anuj Choudhary Ror—further. Yamla suggested Balwant Chopra, Transe, and Danse have similarities, but I have proved myself right and honest by providing evidence from Wikipedia's investigation tool itself. This tool of interaction clearly showed you made great mistakes and errors while blocking me and judging, and unfortunately, you labeled me a sock of two accounts. 3rd account also proved I am not linked to such account. The last Transe and Danse account clearly showed I made some reverts only at the pages where this wrongly claimed master Transe and Dance was involved in major edits. I am different from such account because I made just some reverts, undoing disruption or vandalism, and it still doesn't prove me Sock of this account when other three wrongly linked accounts also proved myself innocent. I request that you please see your mistakes and decisions again. You are an admin here. I am a common user. Just imagine how millions of people will face such wrong linking, blocking and wrongly labeling of being sock by admins here. You are also a human being, but when three accounts already prooved me, just now the fourth was suggested by Yamla, not by you, I still have only similarity at the ground where I just made some undos and reverts only, and this matches my account with Transe and Dance, and now I am sock and have used multiple accounts. This is totally unfair. I cannot defend myself here because I am helpless. I don't have the adminship that you have and only God knows I am right also prooved myself by giving evidence but millions of innocent users are unable to do so.And I didn't commit a crime for which you lebeled me being a sock and blocked me. But Only God can be just and he knows the truth. But I can only request to you that you please review your action of wrongly linking, blocking, and declaring my account as sock for no reason when Wikipedia's tool of interaction has prooved my self right and just. To be honest, I don't know which tool you're using and you are not considering Wikipedia's tool of interaction reliable.? Please be just and honest, see these examples, and review your mistake. I am also providing you same evidences generated by Wikipedia's interation tool if you don't consider this tool as reliable then it's.
 * see these examples please
 * ''for Fancy vibēs vs Balwant Chopra see (|for Fancy vibēs vs Balwant Chopra see), for Fancy vibēs vs AnujRor see (| fancy vibēs vs AnujRor),
 * for Fancy vibēs vs Anuj Choudhary Ror see
 * (| Fancy vibēs vs Anuj Choudhary Ror).'' Fancy vißes  ( call ) 21:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)