User talk:Fandemode

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sceptre (talk) 22:12, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Strand of Silk (www.strandofsilk.com)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)


 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tagishsimon (talk) 03:10, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Amartyabag. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Clothing in India because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  16:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:24, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Strandofsilk, I fixed the formatting on your unblock request, but you need to fill in a reason why you should be unblocked. In your case, for instance, you need to specifically explain what you are going to do on Wikipedia other than spam your company. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you understand that you cannot link to the strandofsilk site in any way? Ever? On any page in Wikipedia? The only exception would be if the site got it's own Wikipedia article, but I see that that's already been declined three times, and probably won't happen, since 99% or more of all web pages are simply not notable enough for a Wikipedia article.
 * I think something that might help me or other admins evaluate this request is if you gave an example of something you would add to a Wikipedia article, now that you know the rules. Tell us here what page you would add the info to, what info you would add, and what reliable source you would use to support that addition. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Qwyrxian, here is an example of what I would like to post: New Page : Anarkali Dress An Anarkali Dress can be described as a long kurta which has a much more defined waistline and bust as compared to a traditional Salwar kameez suit. The kurta is fitted on the bust and normally features large pleats flowing around the legs like an umbrella. Derived from the word Kali, which means a bud.

Anarkali dresses owe their name to Anarkali - a famous courtesan in the court of a great mughal emperor. The story of Anarkali was immortalised because of her affair with the emperor's son, that ended in tragedy when Anarkali was buried alive behind a wall.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarkali


 * I'm not sure how the description of a dress needs a new article? This isn't FashionWiki (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 10:52, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


 * This is a specific kind of dress from India that is popular. It is the same reason that all the specific pages on types of dresses already exist on wikipedia - (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sari) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.244.250 (talk) 09:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Strandofsilk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Glaisher (talk) 17:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
 * I'd waffled about blocking you, but the more I think about it the more this is clearly a case of spamming. You were given a pretty big warning about spamming, so there really was no reason for you to recreate a spam userpage for User:Strandofsilk. (Your previous username, which you'd had unblocked by an admin.) I'm sorry, but I can't run the risk of unblocking you and then having you attempt to re-add another spam userpage or mainspace page at some point in time. I'll ask another admin to review this, but you had already had sufficient warnings about spamming. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   18:03, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Roopa Vohra


A tag has been placed on Roopa Vohra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tek022 &#124; Comments?  06:11, 15 July 2013 (UTC)