User talk:Fang Aili/Archive11

vandalism
Hi,

I've noticed a few days ago you blocked user 205.175.121.101. Today he vandalized another article, as you can see here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:205.175.121.101

Cesar Tort 18:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for putting Adam Deitch back up so quick, and for reconsidering!

Methodicalj 20:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Dalbury
Per your question - the "harassment" was supposed to be a bit of humor. Just in case you're worried, I didn't bite his ankles either. KillerChihuahua?!? 10:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

archive edits
Are you okay with people editing your archive pages?? - CobaltBlueTony 14:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Could you please take a look at the Martial Race article particularly, the Modern Usage section as there is contradictions in the article, Iduleguy says something and when you got to verity his sources the claims state otherwise. Please see discussion of the article. This is my diff here and is consistent with the sources, his diffs contradict the sources in which he is taking some comments out of context and adding his own commentary to the article. He is also removing the tag on the section and removing my information. He is only doing this as when you actually read the links (citation) its nothing like what he trying to state in the article on wiki. He is clearly deliberately embellishing the truth and adding his own commentary. -- S treet S cholar   18:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * If you do read it, please take time to read complete articles on the 4 India Pakistan Wars (the sources provided within those articles) and then the citations given in the martial race article to arrive at a complete picture. I fear Street Scholar is doing injustice to historical writing by not even reading the sources provided and misreading (if he does read i.e.) one line for another. He claims that i said 65 and 47 wars were drubbings to Pakistan, when clearly, I have said it is only 71 war. Street Scholar expects to have even the sources read out, line by line and wants only online sources, which is incredulous. btw, he is also racially and religously biased IMO, with statements like "idolaters" being used, not mentioned in the original cite. Idleguy 19:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid I'm completely out of my element when it comes to this subject. All I can do right now is ask you both to assume good faith and remain civil. Consider taking your case to mediation if needs be. Sorry I can't be of more help. --Fang Aili talk 19:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * And also 3RR. You are both in violation of that or very nearly, already. --Fang Aili talk 19:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Bagnall Elementary School
So somebody deleted all the information I put into the page and as I trying to find the category for "Magnet Schools in Massachusetts", you added the deletion notice. It's a "magnet" school, meaning it has nationwide recognition for something of which I'm no expert, but I truly expected it to remain for more than a few hours. LymanSchool 22:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. Hopefully somebody will improve the aiticle, it's referenced in Groveland, Massachusetts and I have promises that some high school students will make entries for the referenced (red-lined) high schools. I just put in the grade school for balance. LymanSchool 23:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * There isn't much of anything. Hopefully something will get added. Since I live in Groveland, Massachusetts, I decided to fix up the entry that had been hacked and 'gestimated' by anonymous for about a year. This involved adding the school that was supposed to be --well famous??? That's what the townsfolk say anyway. With your new tag, maybe somebody will tell us why it's famous...later. --LymanSchool 01:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Patrick Lenehan
Hi Fang Aili, I put up a new article about "Patrick Lenehan." You may think that this was not a big deal, but he scored 5 goals in one game for the two-time defending national champions Messiah College. Please reconsider your deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.42.165.133 (talk • contribs)

Food Ninja
Why did you delete the food ninja article? It is fact as my neighbor and I have experienced this many many times. We eventually heard about who was doing it, and were shocked. But now, it has become a legend in these parts and there is now an increasingly growing number of incidents. Please do not delete it as it is informative. Note, it is not vandalism, nothing is ever damaged. As it was stated the food is always whole, and in still eatable form... ie, not splattered or anything. I experienced whole, warm still wrapped taco bell burritos on my deck! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Foodninja (talk • contribs)

Craftster
Hi there!

I started my very first article yesterday, "Craftster." I was curious as to why it's been removed? I read lots of tutorials and such and tried to do my best. :)

It's an online community such as LiveJournal, but it's only for entries about crafting, recycling, etc. No personal blogs are allowed on the site and everything is organized into categories based on the project being discussed (housewares, knitting, etc.).

Any help or guidance you could provide would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks so much, Jean


 * Hello again! Thanks for your super fast reply.  :)  Would it be possible for you to send me the text of the original article so I could edit it to be more of an encyclopedic tone?  I tried, but I think I'm just naturally too chipper!  I'll try again.  :)  Could you help me in determining which would be some great examples of notability?  I was thinking these, but I'm not sure and could use some guidance:


 * Associated Content Article


 * WorldStart


 * Wisconsin State Journal


 * TIME.com


 * USA Today Hot Site


 * Sfist


 * Thanks again for all of your help,
 * Jean


 * Thanks AGAIN! You're the best!  I'll try to work on it tonight!  Sorry I forgot to sign before, but I've got the hang of it now! ;)


 * Sweets4ever 22:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi there
I have just been getting a bit of advice from the administrator who put the delete tag on my article Graphic Display Systems and he said that i should recreate the article and apologised for marking my work with an advertising tag. I'm a very new contributor to wikipedia and have made a few mistakes which i really do intend to iron out. There was a blatant advertising tag on my article which really disillusioned me as i'm not advertising any products in particular– just really keen on putting my first full article onto wikipedia (my friend has published quite a few articles on fairtrade) as i think it's a cool hobby. I have made a previous article Roller Banners which is intended to be a part of my main article in which i hope to provide as much information as possible including; how to use tools for display systems, forums to visit where these things are discussed, the many different types of systems used and where they are used. I also searched wikipedia extensively and found some articles on point of sale but nothing really in depth regarding my subject area so i believe it's a great chance to share some of the knowledge i have accumulated (and am still collecting!) aswell as being constructive in my spare time. Please can you help me to get my article back, perhaps give me some helpful pointers and let me carry on. I know you're probably busy and have a whole bunch of things to do but i'm no advertiser and i'd like to get on as i've got loads more to do. Your help will be much appreciated. Peter lowe 19:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I made the request now at Deletion review. And I am not a sysop.  Peter O. (Talk) 19:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Admin Coaching
Hey Fang Aili!

Something strange is going on over at the Admin coaching page. User:The Transhumanist recently created an "Admin School" which was supposed to do...well, basically the same thing as Admin Coaching: prep editors for Adminship, though it was run by non-Admins. It appears this was quickly rejected by the community. Now, a few users, including Transhumanist, have posted to the Admin Coaching talk page. They want to change the name of the program. They also want to change how the program is run, with proposals for multiple levels of "trust", etc. Since these folks aren't admins, and since The Transhumanist has only been with us for a few months, these proposals are a little strange: their new "Virtual classroom" talks about what browser to use, but doesn't address anything that an Admin trainee would need to become an admin. It's alarming, because these nice folks have had no experience being admins, and in Carcharoth's latest post he proposes revamping the entire program, with a system of levels through which users would have to "graduate" (which is, I assume, where the Virtual School comes in. Since you are an admin coach, and these many proposed changes will affect you, please weigh in on the discussion here. Thanks, Firsfron of Ronchester  19:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am coaching Exir Kamalabadi, trying to give all the advice given to me by my admin coach. I think the admin coaching program is great, and needs no changes, but I'm certainly willing to support adjustments. But these proposals come from people who haven't ever been admins, and The Transhumanist has only been editing for four months. The changes proposed are drastic, and appear to place an emphasis on things an admin candidate should already know. Thanks for looking. Firsfron of Ronchester  20:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, my last trainee, Ginkgo100, was great long before I even met her. She didn't require a lot of training, just some helpful advice. Exir is also coming along very well. Regarding the "schools": Transhumanist first started "Admin school. When that was deleted, he started a "virtual classroom". Now these efforts to rework Admin Coaching, with multiple levels... you're absolutely right. It's total instruction creep. Firsfron of Ronchester  20:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Deleting image
Why is the map image for "Bell Mall, Utsunomiya" keep getting deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.83.252.234 (talk • contribs)
 * Image:E bellmap.jpg
 * Bell Mall, Utsunomiya

re: admin coaching stuff (eom)
 Th e Tr ans hu man ist  07:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

deletion
your attempting to delete my wiki on the rapper Patomic, all the information is correct and the wiki was made due to mass lobbying on me, so just keep it, i made it as legit as possible, Thanks for your time Patomic 04:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Clarinet makers
I would request that there be some prior discussion before deleting all external links.

It may be justified -- certainly that list is unusual; including all those links may be inappropriate -- but so is wholesale deletion without explanation.

Oh, and thanks for the heads up on the E. J. Albert RfD! -- Rsholmes 20:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * re: Albert - no problem, happy to help a worthy article and a worthy subject. Mak (talk)  20:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

It'd help if you'd provide a pointer to the guideline(s) being violated. Thanks. -- Rsholmes 21:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks -- pretty much what I thought once the subject came up. -- Rsholmes 21:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of Slang Ozzanese
I noticed from your edit summary that you deleted this article because it was ‘not English’. Certainly that was true; however, I wonder whether you were perfectly aware of what the Template:Notenglish (which I believe had been placed at the head of the article) is intended to convey? In brief it is not saying: ‘Please, if you happen upon this article and are an administrator, could you delete this?’

Rather it is saying: ‘Yes, this article is in a foreign language, but please do not delete it at this moment. I have listed it on the page Pages needing translation into English and it will be looked at and considered for translation.’

This article was in fact listed only today on Pages needing translation into English. The idea is that Wikipedians sufficiently fluent in foreign languages can read and review such articles, checking for notability and copyright infringements and, if appropriate, turn them into English articles: sometimes by translating them in full, sometimes by adapting them, sometimes, if the article is problematic, but the subject is significant, by reducing them to stubs. Sometimes they may be transwikied.

The aim, of course, is not to salvage everything which appears on the English Wikipedia in a foreign language. If after two weeks the article has not been turned into English it is listed on Articles for deletion. Very often it is Speedied much earlier than that by an editor who knows the language and can see that it is inherently nonsense, vanity, copy-vio or whatever.

Please forgive what may seem an overlong plea for the reinstatement of this article. (In fact, though I would like you to undelete it, I thought when I glanced at it that it was rubbish. Although it must said that on at least one occasion I have identified a foreign language article as blatant self-promoting nonsense which was nothing of the sort.) But what really concerns me is that you may have been misled by the wording of the Notenglish template. Perhaps it needs to say something more clearly to admins who come across it. Might you have any suggestions there?

Cheers, —Ian Spackman 23:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Request for administrator attention
I'd like to place links to the Admin coaching program at the following locations, but they keep getting systematically removed or reverted:


 * Administrators
 * Administrators' how-to guide
 * Community Portal
 * Department directory
 * Department directory
 * Guide to requests for adminship
 * Help:Contents/The Wikipedia community

I've also placed a see also reference in the lead paragraph of Administrators' reading list, but I don't know how long it will last.

Various reasons have been cited, including "it's a controversial program of a controversial group". Whatever the reasons, the end result is that Admin coaching is being choked off and isolated from the Wikipedia community of which it is supposedly a part.

The Transhumanist 04:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Hempology 101
I believe you have deleted my hempology 101 page. I am not sure why, and would appreciate an explanation and any assistance you can provide in making the page acceptable to wikipedia standards. The Hempology 101 club is a long standing organization in Victoria with several hundred members. It functions to further the cause of medical marijuana and holistic health. I have permission to reproduce all content copied onto the site. I appreciate your attention in resolving these issues.

Spidercam

Spidercam 06:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Aconite (band) deletion
Hi, i was wondering why you deleted the page on the band aconite. It was my first addition, and i tried my best, if it is a lack of information then that is a problem, because there isn't anything more to know, since as someone I know knew them personally, and that is everything they know. Moredhel92 12:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
Can you please help? Apocolocynthosis is adding unsourced, unverifed claims to the article Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. He claims he has a source but he doesn't cite it. He persisits despite multiple warnings. I (and a few other people) try to reason with him, but he then acts like a 10-year old and accuses us of censorship. It's really getting out of hand. Armanalp 19:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Kruse International
Why did you delete the Kruse International article? You had no reason to. Please advsise why you took this action. Thank you. Manningmbd 21:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Kruse International
The article was created by the founder's son, but I understand why you deleted it. I will eventually create a new article with original text and no copyright violations. Thank you. Manningmbd 21:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of jewelkilcherforum.com
Hi!

I noticed you deleted my article for jewelkilcherforum.com. Could you please explain why??

I never meant to break any rules or policies. I merely wanted to start a wiki page that describes my website. I have seen many other wikipedia pages doing the same. So I apologise if I did anything wrong but I would just like to understand what happened.

Thanks Kiera Jewelkilcherforum 22:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Vladislav Lalicki picture
Hi, sorry if I made some mistake, article Vladislav Lalicki, you removed the picture from the top, can you please tell me why, the pic is free for use, so no policies are broken, the mr. Vladislav is mine father in law, and I have full permission for him to use the pic's and documents as I like.

thanks for the answer regards, Bogdan p.s. - the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:VL21.jpg i added by mistake, so if you can, you can delete it from the system not to take valuable space Arhimed 17:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Roger Boylan
Please explain deletion of article on Dalkey Archive and Grove author Roger Boylan.

Brendan619Brendan619 17:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)



"Beginning Experience"
You deleted my entry for Beginning Experience. We ARE NOT a commercial company or service but a group of widowed, divorced, and separated individuals working through the grief of the loss of our marriages. Please explain to me why you are deleted information about our grief support structure.

Pekeller 00:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC) Paul Keller 13 November 2006


 * Beginning Experience

Help!
Hey Fang. I was restoring Abaana because another user wants to send the article to DRV. The problem was that I restored the page accidentally over the existing page, and I now can't back the pre-deletion page. Any help?  Nish kid 64  00:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually. I think I fixed it lol. Yay! Sorry for bothering you :-P.  Nish kid 64  00:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

deletion of article
Hi, I was wondering why you deleted my article on Cary Academy cross country. It was a sufficiently detailed, truthful article. I admit that some of the meaning in some parts of the article may not have been sufficiently explained, but I do not think there was anything that warranted deletion. Thank you Mah159 01:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)Mark


 * Cary Academy Cross Country
 * Cary Academy Cross Country

Dalbury's RfA
My RfA passed with a tally of 71/1/0. Thank you very much for your support. I hope that my performance as an admin will not disappoint you. Please let me know if you see me doing anything inappropriate. -- Donald Albury 02:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

The Tuna Helpers
There is no reason this should have been deleted. You created a redlink on Trey Spruance when you did so. A speedy deletion was an inappropriate action. --Scottandrewhutchins 06:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The Tuna Helpers
 * The Tuna Helpers

What constitutes asserting notability?--Scottandrewhutchins 18:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

"Important note: Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion" I think you need to reread this line over and over, as I think what I wrote made sufficient claim. You had no business speedy deleting the article--Scottandrewhutchins 18:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

welsh benefits investigation group - deleted entry (A7/G11)
Hi I'm new to wikipedia and recently created an entry for a group that I chair. We are a closed group with membership available only to local authorities (local governemnt)in our geographical area. We are also not for profit, our primary source of income is a membership fee from the 22 members.

We abbreviate the groups name to the WBIG and I have an entry for that which did link to the full name (as above).

I would like to recreate the entry for the Welsh Benefits Investigation Group but dont want to waste your time or mine.

Cheers

Dave 14/11/06 Daibut 12:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Welsh Benefits Investigation Group
 * Welsh Benefits Investigation Group

Harlow rugby club - what are you doing?
Please explain your unwanted intervention on the Harlow Rugby Club entry. You have vandalised the site - deleted pictures and what for? I am not an experienced Wiki author but I see nothing wrong with the Harlow entry - in fact I went to the trouble of reading many other sports club entries (inc clubs that are younger than Harlow as if age makes a difference) before submitting the Harlow entry. I want you to return the entry to how it was before you vanalised is immediately.

I will be reporting this to the moderators who oversee Wiki.UrquartXV 15:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC) UrquartXV 15:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)#

Could you also explain to me what your knowledge of rugby union is as well seeing as you claim to be an expert on what constitutes a 'notable' rugby club. UrquartXV 17:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Harlow rugby club
 * Harlow rugby club

You still haven't answered my question as to why you want to delete this entire entry because you say the club is not 'notable'. If this is the reason behind your actions then you should explain yourself better. Why is Harlow Rugby Club not considered a 'notable' enough sports club??UrquartXV 19:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Have you got any idea just how many sports clubs are listed on Wikipedia that would also 'fail' your notability 'test'? Just on the English rugby clubs alone (I read virtually all of them prior to the Harlow entry) are exactly the same status as Harlow! The Harlow text even includes the 'notable' achievement of the Harlow colts team winning 100 games straight! It seems to me that your notion of notability consists of a trawl through recent entries (across all sorts of topics and articles) and arbitrarily saying they should be deleted without any prior information or knowledge of the article you wish to delete - you have even admitted as much! You feel you are on the moral high ground because the notability clause is by far the most subjective and ambiguous criteria that Wikipedia consider important. Your talk page is full of similar complaints. If the information I have written is wrong, inaccurate, poorly spelt or laid out then fine - I welcome you input but please, just remember, not everyone has the same interests as you. UrquartXV 19:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Unprompted removal?
Hi. You deleted a page on huddle (software) recently. Can you please clarify why this was deleted? One of our customers notified me this morning that the page had been removed. If you have comments / suggestions for the page i would ask that you contact me before simply delting - I would be more than happy to take your comments on board. Please email me andy@huddle.net with your response. Many thanks :) Amcloughlin 14:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Huddle (software)
 * Huddle (software)

Chippenham Hospital Radio
Hi,

Why have you deleted the CHIPPENHAM HOSPITAL RADIO page? All copy in this article (except for one line - which was used with permission of the website builder) was original work to me. One of the reasons in your deletion log was 'copy vio', which I assume is copy violations, which I think you'll find if I have the express and prior approval of the wesbite creator then it is not Copy Violations. The one and only picture on the website is copyright to me - I took the photograph so it belongs to me. It is not spamming or advertising, we are a CHARITY. But if you are still insistent - in that case pages such as GWR Radio I reccommend for deletion, as they demonstrate blatant advertising.

Thanks

Jason Martin thejpmshow@aol.com


 * Chippenham hospital radio
 * Chippenham hospital radio

Ok then you must have your reasons - but they seem hypacritical deleting this page and letting the GWR FM page stay, multi linked it may be but Wikipedia clearly states it is not here to advertise - however this page on GWR FM Swindon is clearly advertising. I encourage you to moderate it for yourself. Also the page 'You Really Got Me' (a song by 1960s pop group - The Kinks) is what I could describe as defamatory. Please make neccesary adjustments to that.

Thanks
For your comments and level head (as always). Firsfron of Ronchester 21:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Your thoughts:
I posted this on the MfD discussons page, on how to fix Esperanza's ... issues. What do you think?


 * 1) Lack of percieved connection to the community in terms of concrete contributions to Wikipedia : by this, I mean that many people cannot see the "good" Esperanza does. Any reform you undertake must therefore address this point or we'll be back in here in six months.
 * 2) Lack of focus on contributing to the Wiki vis-a-vis amount of time spent on Esperanza: You cannot place so much focus on intropian things such as page beautification, wikifairying, having competitions about page looks, running large gaming sections, etc. If you want to do these things, you need to place them in a context where people outside Esperanza can find value in them. For the page beautification stuff, run a series of tutorials on editing and elements of WikiMarkup and then have the users use their pages as the basis, with the idea that they can also use these things in article creation/template making/etc. With the games, make them focus on article surfing/creation/editing, like WikiRPG, Word Association,etc. Try to minimize efforts that focus on projects internal to Esperanza, since that only severs you from the community.
 * 3) Focus on a sense of community : the problem with this is that there is NO attempt currently by Esperzana to extend their sense of community outside the group. Without that, it makes you look to the uninitiated as if you are a clique. I don't have any really hot recommendations on how to remedy this outside of expanding the intensity of welcoming procedures (maybe) and working more heavily with other WikiProjects.
 * 4) Circular Returns : too much of Esperanza's efforts, and the efforts of it's members, are spent on perpetuating the group. Esperanza barnstars, banners, graphics, templates, page layouts, text boxes, userboxes, and transcluded newsletters go way beyond what other WikiProjects and even WikiOrgs like CVG and CCD do. A less ... intrusive approach may serve better.

There's more but if these were fixed, 85% of the opposition to Esperanza would collapse. Note that simply saying these are not problems does not change the fact that 'they are problems, whether or not you agree. This is not really about Esperanzan's view of Esperanza...but the view of non-Esperanzans. Trying to suggest our viewpoint is invalid in evaluating Esperanza just makes things worse. Trying to change makes things better. -- Elaragirl  | | | | | | Talk 21:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Virtual classroom lesson #2
I thought you might be happy to learn that the sharing of ideas is going full steam ahead at the VC. We've moved on to our second lesson, though each lesson is continuous so more ideas may emerge from the interface share and compare discussions as well. From all the ideas presented in those sections, I've created a new tools page accessible from my userpage menu. The current lesson focuses on "stubbing," with a short course to kick off discussion provided by our resident expert on the subject, Grutness. Please feel free to add your expertise and questions.

To help keep track of what's going on, here's a template you can place at the top of your userpage or talk page:

Hope to see you at the Virtual classroom again soon. The Transhumanist 14:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Question
Hi,

I see you wandering the web in search for zen blows...

Is deleting articles making you feel better ?...

If yes, I should provide you a new opportunity to ambush the path to the Oracle again...

Can you provide me a straight reasonable motive for your recent action ?...

XEvolution

--XEvolution 16:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)



I refer to the article about the XEvolution Oracle, XEvolution life Approach, XEvolution Online Tests...

XEvolution Founder

Did you read your own answer ?
You delete articles only for what they "look like" ?... Did you gave a glance at least ?... If I would be as superficial as you "seem", I would ask you : there is a notion in the article, about a new type of psychological test, an "active" one, based on the energy of the word and the direct effect on the subconscious attitude of the individuals... these type of tests are called XEvolution Tests, because they are used to trans-mute the actual human genes... the article also referred to an Oracle that helps the self seekers in their quest... And the question is : how many XEvolution tests are in the pointed site ?... —Preceding unsigned comment added by XEvolution (talk • contribs)

How considerate from you...
If you have plenty of time to break, I don't have the same time to create... Next time, please read the article you intend to delete, and I will try also to be more accurate in re-editing it... Have a good week-end ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by XEvolution (talk • contribs)

i just have a question for you
why did you attack our page?? honestly, referring to the subject of nolan trapp?? why do you have to do that it took us hours to create that page!! and to validate the authenticity of the information. hours and hours of research went into that page soo i will attempt to recreate it and if you delete it again i will report you to wikipedia authoritative services for deleting our page for no reason!!! THE LEAST YOU CAN DO IS PROVIDE A LEGITIMATE REASON!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by JackKilby (talk • contribs)

im trying to show you something but you delete my page before i finish
well may i clarify my response?? around here he is a very well known football player and baseball player. he is in every newspaper in the state. if you allow me to put this website on here it will bring tons of people to this website that havent already visited. please im trying to help you out here!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by JackKilby (talk • contribs)

Robinson image
Hi, Is there any particular reason why you removed the image of Gene Robinson's consecration? Was there a copyright dispute? Carolynparrishfan 18:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of "The Adventures of Bill & John Episode 1: Danger in the Sky"
Hello,

I find the A7 deletion of the article The Adventures of Bill & John Episode 1: Danger in the Sky a borderline case at best: As a compromise, I have created a combined page for the entire series, The Adventures of Bill & John, which surely must fall under the notability guidelines.
 * The video won an award
 * It was separately nominated for four other major awards
 * It was referenced elsewhere in Wikipedia (links I'll have to correct -- sigh)
 * The successor episode won four major awards

I do respect your efforts to keep Wikipedia clean, however I would appreciate it if you left a note at my Talk page.

And I would recommend you look a the Bill & John videos -- they are truly remarkable, even if that is not your sort of thing.

Regards, Gladstone 19:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society
Why did you delete my Pennsylvania Horticultural Society page? I clearly indicated that I was working on it and trying to make it conform to Wiki guidelines. Why couldn't you email me and discuss this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PHS1 (talk • contribs)

Request for opinion
Hello, I am contacting you since I saw your name listed at the Dance WikiProject, as someone having an interest in folk dance. There is currently a dance professor's biography (for the record, this professor, Elsie Ivancich Dunin, is a blood relative of mine), which has been nominated for deletion. It is my opinion that most of the people involved in the deletion discussion are not familiar with dance academia, so I'd like to see that a link to the deletion discussion is posted somewhere on Wikipedia where those interested in dance, could be made aware of the article so that they could offer an opinion. The debate is currently at Articles for deletion/Elsie Ivancich Dunin. Do you have any suggestions on where a link could be posted? Thanks. --Elonka 22:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Have a good wikibreak
Hi Erica, your page is on my watchlist, so I noticed your changes. Have a good wikibreak! -- Kyok o  17:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Seconded! Have a great one! :) Firsfron of Ronchester  20:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Mention reason of deletion
Hey bro I wana reason of Sohna khan.jpg photo deletion from article Sakhani, please response as soon as possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghulam Nabi (talk • contribs)


 * Image:Sohna.jpg