User talk:Fangfest

Welcome!

Hello, Fangfest, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as One&, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bazj (talk) 11:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of One&Other


(Fangfest (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC))

A tag has been placed on One&Other, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bazj (talk) 11:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of One&Other


A tag has been placed on One&Other, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:42, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

One&Other
Hi. If you wish  to  contact  another editor  or admin, please do not  use article space. Instead, simply click  the link in  his/her signature to  access their talk  page, and leave your message there. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:55, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Response
Sure, thanks for asking. And welcome to Wikipedia. :)  The policy that we're dealing with here is this one.  If you follow that link, it gives a couple of specific things that could be used (any one of these is required):

''The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations[4] except for the following: If you can help provide references that support one of those, we're in good shape. - Philippe 13:59, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ''Media re-prints of press releases and advertising for the content or site.
 * ''Trivial coverage, such as
 * ''newspaper articles that simply report the Internet address,
 * ''newspaper articles that simply report the times at which such content is updated or made available,
 * ''a brief summary of the nature of the content or the publication of Internet addresses and site, and
 * ''content descriptions in Internet directories or online stores.
 * ''The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization.
 * The content is distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster; except for trivial distribution including content being hosted on sites without editorial oversight (such as YouTube, Facebook, Newgrounds, personal blogs, etc.).

Ways to improve From Elevated Gangways Rivers of Molten Metal Flow
Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Fangfest, thanks for creating From Elevated Gangways Rivers of Molten Metal Flow!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs more references providing substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 20:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Mduvekot - thanks for your attention and helpful comments. The Quietus reference is an independent and reliable source that provides substantial coverage (The publication being an established media company of many years) - therefore a most suitable reference for the page. I have also added a link to Discogs to quantify the information. I believe the issue is addressed and the tag may be removed? Thanks for all the great work you are doing for Wikipedia - Best wishes (Fangfest (talk) 08:33, 13 April 2017 (UTC))

Hi again Mduvekot please find link to The Quietus - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Quietus (Fangfest (talk) 08:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)) Thankyou

Your Help Request
Hi Fangfest, I see you've placed help me on your talk page. What do you need help with? Best, — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 15:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC)