User talk:Fangusu

Note to admins reviewing unblock requests
For anyone considering any unblock requests (via UTRS presumably), please be aware that Fangusu has been evading their block - see User talk:172.58.24.53 and User talk:172.56.40.140. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I've been moving those requests to this page's archive: . Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I've updated the archive to include all four of the IP unblock requests that I know about. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note that I have blocked Fangusu from UTRS for six months for making repeated unblock requests that essentially duplicate those made here.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:32, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, there's a grain of good news in that, at least she's reading what we've been telling her. Now if she'll just get to the "six months" part. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Block evasion occurred on 2016-09-19, see. Six months will have elapsed on 2017-03-19. --Yamla (talk) 14:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

For anyone else considering an unblock request, please also see Long-term abuse/Fangusu, which shows she has been socking continuously for eight years, and is still at it. Unblocking her after six months would be extremely generous. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

This user's block prevents editing this page or sending email, due to years and years of abuse. Realistically, their only remaining venue of appeal is WP:ARBCOM. However, given they are still, after more than eight years, evading their block, ARBCOM is highly unlikely to be willing to consider the appeal at this time. Fangusu needs to show some modicum of good faith by refraining from any further ban evasion for at least six months and, given the history of evasion, probably considerably longer. --Yamla (talk) 18:59, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

There's been another one at User talk:172.56.38.244. It's not worth copying them all the this page's archive, but it's probably worth keeping one every few months, so I've copied this one there too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Just noting here that one of Fangusu's IP ranges has been blocked for six months by, though I can't say from what I see that the block is (entirely) due to Fangusu's activity. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, but I can say for sure that the 1-month block of this other IP range is because of Fangusu. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Nope, I was going after Judtojud (see this ANI discussion) ... but wow that IP range has caused an awful lot of problems. Graham 87 01:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Update: Note I have again revoked Fangusu's access to UTRS as he is still not following the crystal clear directions provided by below.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  20:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Update: Socking as an IP as recently as May 27th, 2019; CU confirmed. Yunshui 雲 水 10:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * ...And Fangusu has now socked on 31 December 2019. Steel1943  (talk) 03:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Unblock instructions
, lots of editors have told you exactly what you need to do if you want to be unblocked. Here it is one more time. Read this and follow these instructions, otherwise you will not be unblocked. This is paraphrased from our policy at WP:SOCKBLOCK.


 * 1) Do not edit from any account nor while logged out anywhere on English Wikipedia. No edits at all. For six months.
 * 2) After six months of not editing at all, and send a request to the Arbitration Committee using .

Those are the two things you need to do if you want to be unblocked. We could not be more clear. This is the only way. I guarantee it.


 * If you choose not to follow these instructions,
 * If you make a request on any user's talk page,
 * If you make a request prior to six months with no edits,
 * If you make any edit at all, no matter how constructive, anywhere on English Wikipedia,

Six months from today is November 9, 2017. If you respect your siteban and do not attempt to edit Wikipedia at all, then make a proper request to the Arbitration Committee as instructed above after November 9, 2017, your request will be considered. Otherwise, the answer is and always will be no. ( Modified from this original by Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC) ) - Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2017 (UTC)


 * UTRS request made and declined today (see UTRS#19724 for those with permissions). Have advised user to email Arbcom, per the instructions above. Yunshui 雲 水 15:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)


 * This has been stale a good long time, but this edit resets the clock. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 01:42, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I would like to note that the Arbitration Committee does not review community bans unless they fall within specific narrow categories. Please see here. As this ban does not fall within those categories, it falls to the community to decide any appeal by this editor. ~ Rob 13 Talk 05:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

UTRS
--  Deep fried  okra    03:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

on the other hand
I would be happy to present the contents of your UTRS request. However, the outcome would not be in your favor.--  Deep fried  okra    03:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

"List of enemies in Doom 3" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of enemies in Doom 3. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 30 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 09:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 11:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

is closed. One year UTRS ban. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:31, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Ban evasion
This user evaded their ban as in May and June, 2023. --Yamla (talk) 16:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #86810
is closed. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)