User talk:Fanny Dürfeldt

Ways to improve Quality mark South Tyrol
Hi, I'm Gaff. Fanny Dürfeldt, thanks for creating Quality mark South Tyrol!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. http://www.southtyroleanqualityfood.com/en/quality-seal/history.html The history about quality mark "South Tyrol"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 02:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Quality mark South Tyrol


A tag has been placed on Quality mark South Tyrol, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.southtyroleanqualityfood.com/en/quality-seal/history.html The history about quality mark "South Tyrol". (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 02:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality mark South Tyrol
The whole article must be rewritten from scratch, because it is a copyright violation. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The article was a copyright violation of this. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required. We cannot restore copyrighted text for legal reasons.
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Most of the text was reference only to your website (not independent) or not at all.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: ... a higher quality than the standard requires... Independent and certified authorities check the adherence to the quality requirements.. these excellent products... it was clear that the trademark should be adapted... Quality must always be in the foreground of the message... The mark of quality serves the consumer as a sign it says and guarantees that production methods meet much higher, more selective and more objective quality criteria... 

Nomination of South Tyrol quality mark for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Tyrol quality mark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/South Tyrol quality mark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaff (talk) 16:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)