User talk:Fantasydragon/2008 Discussions

Losers Rule
Sorry, but Losers Rule is not a notable website, by our standards. See WP:WEB for more details. -- Zanimum 19:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Ratchet & Clank (series)
Please do not revert this edit again. You are removing a lengthy bit of information. Your addition is very unencyclopedic, as Wikipedia isn't here for just links to another page to describe whatever the section/article is about. Thank you. --- Fantasy Dragon (talk) 01:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * the anme is ratchet and clank: quest for booty, not just ratchet, u have it listed as downlaodable content which it is not, its a psn game by itself and all that info is just about it being a rumored release, now i provided a source that says it is a game itself and provided a link, it is unnessacy to have  a paragraph of a game being rumored, plz do not change it again, thanks Shake 3000 (talk) 04:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, well if the information is wrong, then fix the information, don't delete it. Otherwise, what you are doing is vandalism. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 21:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Shake 3000
He's a sockpuppet of USEDfan. --Pwnage8 (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Ratchet & Clank Future: Quest for Booty
dude idk where u get ur info, but the platform is the system the game is for, the psn is where u buy the game, that is like listing ebgames or blu ray for the platform, it is a ps3 game, look at sites like ign and gamespot, they say ps3 not psn. Jackk of trades (talk) 05:48, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Where I get my info? There's a source on the article that says that it's being released on both DISC and PSN. That's why BOTH are listed, much like games that are released on the Virtual Console, which is not a platform in itself, just like the PSN, but it is included in other articles and listed under "platform" because it is another way of buying the game, much like when games are ported and then later released on an online store such us the Virtual Console, PSN, and whatever the 360 has. And that is nothing like listing "blu-ray" or "EBgames"...
 * And as I have pointed out before, please see the articles for Donkey Kong Country and Super Mario World. They have their original platforms, PLUS the Virtual Console listed as well. --- Fantasy Dragon (talk) 06:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * it is releasing on bd and psn, those are 2 ways u get buy the game, but there still both nedd the ps3 to play cause its for the ps3 system, Jackk of trades (talk) 06:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. It would probably be best to have this discussion on the article's talk page so that other editors can add their input.  ChimpanzeeUK  - User | Talk | Contribs 07:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. I have also left this message on the other user's talk page. Thanks.  ChimpanzeeUK  - User | Talk | Contribs 07:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Apology
Yeah, sorry about that. I've been deep in stub sorting for two days and didn't notice my typo until you reverted it. It's all good now and I apologize for any misunderstanding. - Dravecky (talk) 20:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not a problem! I just wanted you to know that I wasn't trying to obstruct your edit or anything. --- Fantasy Dragon (talk) 20:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Kerli
I'm sorry, but a template is really not necessary at this point in her career. Three articles only? No. Not yet, anyway. DS (talk) 00:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Evade the Noise
I agree- I've deleted the article. In future, you can nominate articles that meet the criteria (like that one, which was A7 and maybe G11) for speedy deletion, you can propose deletion or nominate for deletion at articles for deletion. Those are processes worth learning- if you need any help, you're welcome to message me and I'll see what I can do. J Milburn (talk) 21:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the navbox title pipe trick
Is there an actual policy regarding this. The last time I saw this was actually in a policy was in an old video game navbox guideline that was eventually disputed enough.

I'm not going to keep reverting or anything, I'm just wondering if a policy for the pipe trick for the titles was reinstated somewhere. Thanks. TH 1 RT 3 EN talk ♦ contribs 02:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm actually not sure on that. I've been going by other template formatting such as Template:Final Fantasy series, Template: Tony Hawk games, Template: Mario series, and Template: Mario Party series. I can't find a policy on it, though, so if there's not one, then go ahead and revert my last edit if you want. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 03:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I was thinking that. But, actually, I've seen an IP user do the pipe trick on several VG navboxes, and I've gotten no response as to why they did it. But it's really no big deal, I just tend to clean it up if I ever see it on templates that I don't watch that don't have that many entries. TH 1 RT 3 EN talk ♦ contribs 03:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

RE: Secret Crowds
Hi, thanks for your message! Sorry, I guess that's a case of not checking the preview page. I've been moving Breathe around, there's a lot of songs named that so a lot of things get directed to it when the link actually needs to be disambiguated. For a while it was actually changed into a page about the A&A song, but it really needs to remain a dab page. I know that the original page for the single was deleted by someone for failing WP:MUSIC, but I'm not sure why. I've been changing the A&A links to Breathe to point to Breathe (Angels & Airwaves song), which as you point out is currently a redirect, but a page about the song should probably be created there. Disambiguating links after a page move is something I do occasionally, and sometimes, when it's a red link, people change it back, preferring to see no link than a red link. This is what I thought had happened here, because I hadn't checked that the link was a redirect. Obviously, I was mistaken, so apologies for any offense caused, feel free to revert again if you haven't already. Tbone762 (talk) 19:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

+44 - When Your Heart Stops Beating
Don't undo this edit. "155 (Acoustic)" is NOT a bonus track on the UK version. It is released on the Lycanthrope (7" Single), as 145, in the UK, but NOT on the actual CD version. Oh, and Cliff Diving is titled as "Cliffdiving" on the actual CD. --PoKiEpAn (talk) 20:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Excuse me. My mistake. No need to be rude about it. Also, um, yeah, I know it's spelled like that on the actual CD. I own the actual CD. The link "Cliff Diving" used to link to its own page, but that has since been redirected to the album article. But when you linked it as "Cliffdiving", it was redirected to "Cliff Diving". I only put it as that to avoid any redirects, so I knew what I was doing. Now that even "Cliff Diving" is redirected, it'd be best to remove the link altogether as it only links back to the page that it is on. --- Fantasy Dragon (talk) 23:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Template
Okay, no problem. Cause it should still be listed weather it is clickable or not. I don't know why the page was deleted, I tried restoring it but someone removed it again. Very unprofessional but thats stupid Wikipedia for you, lol. Xx emote xx (talk) 22:35, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No, it was redirected because it failed notability or something like that. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 22:37, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Maybe Memories
I don't know if you own a copy or not, but if you do please read the back of the case so you can see that I corrected the tracklist to how it should be. Also read the booklet, it says they went to John's house, he left with his dog and when they came back, they recorded it. John didn't write it at all. Hopefully that will clear up the corrections. Xx emote xx (talk) 02:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Punkgoespop2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Punkgoespop2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

The Used
I didn't realize I removed the infobox. I just went back to an older version trying to get rid of some of USEDfan's edits. I restored the infobox a week or so ago where someone had removed it for some reason. I just didn't realize the version I went back to lacked the infobox. The infobox must have been missing for quite some time. Landon1980 (talk) 19:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay. I knew you weren't vandalizing the page, I was just wondering why you would remove it. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 19:10, 31 December 2008 (UTC)