User talk:Fantvamp

I really do not understand you. Wiki is supposed to be as a generic purpose information source, by simply saying GAFF is a General Amber Force Field you are not giving information enought to Amber users, they can click to the AMBER on wiki you left but maybe is also usefull give them the chance of visiting the antechamber page and of course name to the authors. Thats why I have added what GAFF is at the beginning, cause it wasn´t there, you only have modified what I have add at the beginning. I´m an AMBER user and believe me, mention antechamber and the autors is good, first of all I do not know how to add information to wiki and thats why It looks so bad, you want it on that way, OK, do it ..... I´m not a proffesional in wiki, just I do what I think is usefull

Gaff
Please understand that Gaff is a disambiguation page, meaning it contains minimal information about each topic, just enough to get you to the right page. You can read more on disambiguation pages here. You probably want to be editing AMBER.--J Clear 19:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * You are correct that wikipedia is supposed to be a general purpose information souce. However it must have some structure to enable people to find the information.  A disabmiguation page has a particular purpose and structure.  The purpose is to get a user from an ambigous search result to the correct article.  To speed that a particular structure has evolved from a consensus of the editors.  One of the key points is that each different item has only one link, preferably an internal link to an unambiguous wikipedia article on the topic.  WP:MOSDAB is a complete discussion of the style to be used on disambiguation pages.


 * So, while your addition of information to the wikipedia is appreciated, it just needs to be put in the correct place. In this situation you have two choices.  If you feel the Generalized AMBER Force Field, is notable enough to have it's own article, start one here: (Generalized AMBER Force Field), then change the link on Gaff and create a new link on AMBER.  You could start that article in any event, and if it never get's expanded, eventually someone will propose merging the information into AMBER.  If you feel Generalized AMBER Force Field may not be notable enough for its own article, then add your infomation to AMBER directly.


 * One final note, when stating a new topic on a talk or discussion page, please use the "+" tab which prompts you for the topic and adds your comments to the bottom. Then sign your comment by ending your comment with ~ (there is also a button to do that).--J Clear 14:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)