User talk:Farctunt

Recent edit to Messe de Nostre Dame
Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Messe de Nostre Dame article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! SamCordes (talk) 08:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shiloh (biblical city). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 21:33, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * What is your problem? That edit wasn’t vandalism.
 * You keep adding anachronistic names with red links, which is neither helpful nor wanted, that is the problem. Shellwood (talk) 21:40, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Shiloh (biblical city), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. See above comments by  ChromeGames923 (talk) 18:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shiloh (biblical city). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Changing the link to refer to a loosely-defined biblical region is not as useful or precise as a link to a geographical region. It has also been pointed out that you are changing the link to a red link that does not lead anywhere, and it would be less specific even if corrected.'' ChromeGames923 (talk) 20:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shellwood (talk) 20:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)