User talk:Fardawn1

Speedy deletion nomination of Is the van allan belt penetrable
Hello Fardawn1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Is the van allan belt penetrable for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Fardawn1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Espresso Addict (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Re Is the van allan belt penetrable
Hi Fardawn1, thanks for your interest in editing the encyclopedia. I've deleted "Is the van allan belt penetrable" because it duplicates an existing article, Van Allen radiation belt. It's a good tip to do some searches before starting an article to check the material isn't already covered under a different title. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)