User talk:Fardinand Gustaw

Shattari
Hi, as much as your work on the Shattari article is appreciated, links to blogs shouldn't be included as external links. There's few exceptions, but doesn't look like any would apply here. Main purpose of the external link section is to link to e.g. an offical website. Have a look at WP:EL if you like to know more about that. Cheers, NJD-DE (talk) 09:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I have included this because as there are many blogs including althouse were used in Wikipedia, there should no descrimination, also the complete analysis of the site make me satisfied that it was not less than the official website of the order, hope you have understand and will not revert it further Fardinand Gustaw (talk) 10:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , that's a long shot trying to compare this to discrimination.
 * You may be right, that you will find blogs linked in other articles. Partly because sometimes no one cares, not every edit can be/is being checked by others, and partly because there are exceptions for including links to blogs.
 * The guideline on external links says:
 * Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites (negative ones included), except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception for blogs, etc., controlled by recognized authorities is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities who are individuals always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for people.)
 * Althouse's blog is linked in her own article, as it's sort of an official website of hers. Furthermore, Ann Althouse is recognized as a law professor and blogger - even by the New York Times for example. It is not just a copy-paste of texts found somewhere.
 * This is where the blog you linked kind of lacks. It seems very much copy-pasted, and rather than adding value to a reader it only adds value for the blog if we link it. NJD-DE (talk) 10:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't find any substantial form of copy pasted material there, but the reason for me to use that as the link was the introduction post which is giving me a sense that the site is more or less dedicated to the order, which is completely unique, also, before using any site as reference in my research work I use to check several times its authenticity, Hope you understand and neeeds no further explanation, I am closing this discussion now Fardinand Gustaw (talk) 10:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , not sure based on what you checked authenticity. With a quick search, I don't find any major or minor site linking to this blog. I can only find spam-comments in other blogs/sites linking to that blog.
 * If the two of us can't come to a common ground, then we will have to ask for an uninvolved editors opinion. NJD-DE (talk) 10:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * This is where the blog you linked kind of lacks. It seems very much copy-pasted, and rather than adding value to a reader it only adds value for the blog if we link it. NJD-DE (talk) 10:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't find any substantial form of copy pasted material there, but the reason for me to use that as the link was the introduction post which is giving me a sense that the site is more or less dedicated to the order, which is completely unique, also, before using any site as reference in my research work I use to check several times its authenticity, Hope you understand and neeeds no further explanation, I am closing this discussion now Fardinand Gustaw (talk) 10:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , not sure based on what you checked authenticity. With a quick search, I don't find any major or minor site linking to this blog. I can only find spam-comments in other blogs/sites linking to that blog.
 * If the two of us can't come to a common ground, then we will have to ask for an uninvolved editors opinion. NJD-DE (talk) 10:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Sorry, But I don't want to spend any second in this discussion anyomore, I have already provided my views and opinions being a good faith editor, and assuming a good faith for the fellow editor should be followed as the basic norm of wikipedia, Thanks and Happy new year in advance Good Bye Fardinand Gustaw (talk) 10:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , totally understand. If you are done with the discussion on this matter, then you agree with removing the link? NJD-DE (talk) 10:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)