User talk:Farhikht/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikipedia
Mushroom (Talk) 21:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

What is vandalism?
You recently removed the following text from Ali Khamenei with the comment "rm vandalism".


 * Filmmaker Mohammad Nourizad was imprisoned for spreading propaganda.

Apparently you and the editor who inserted the text have a disagreement about whether it belongs on that page, but it is clearly not vandalism. It is a good-faith attempt to add information to Wikipedia. Please read and understandWP:Vandalism before using that word again.

I am going to start a discussion on talk:Ali Khamenei about whether that fact (and similar ones) should be included. Thundermaker (talk) 16:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Please read one phrase before that claim about Nourizad: "Prominent journalists Ahmad Zeidabadi, Mohsen Sazegara, Mohammad Nourizad and Akbar Ganji were arrested and tortured[11][12] [13] [14] for writing critical articles about Khamenei's policies as the supreme leader" which is sourced. What it means spreading propaganda? and why it has to be mention here in Khamenei's article? If someone write in an article on Mohammad Nourizad that Khamenei is writing a book on islam or something like this, do you think that it's not vandalism?Farhikht (talk) 16:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Whether it is vandalism depends on their intent. If someone writes "fuck shit piss", it is almost always vandalism. But if they write something that they believe is true and they believe belongs on that page, it is called a "good-faith edit". If you disagree, the disagreement is called a "content dispute". There are various ways of resolving disputes, but calling the other editor a vandal never helps. There are some good suggestions at WP:Dispute resolution. Thundermaker (talk) 15:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Kasra Tamjidi
Hello Farhikht, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion ofKasra Tamjidi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 19:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 16:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Indian Etemaad
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents ofIndian Etemaad, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Etemaad. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in anedit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. 173.45.72.122 (talk) 14:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

question
Hi, you recently re-directed 2 bonyads:


 * Bonyad Shahid va Isaar-Garaan, and
 * Bonyad Shahid va Omur-e Janbazan

to Foundation of the Martyrs and the Affairs of Self-Sacrificers.

The re-direct itself is fine with me, but why have you merged the two articles? 69.116.236.229 (talk) 05:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry, you are right. I tried to fix it. and I have to say that I didn't merge them, it was just a red link.Farhikht (talk) 11:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merci pour ta reponse. —Preceding unsignedcomment added by 69.116.236.229 (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * De rien, mais pourquoi tu ne crée pas un compte? Il est facile et très rapide.Farhikht (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * mon compte utilisateur est SSZ. —Precedingunsigned comment added by 69.116.236.229 (talk) 17:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour, la réponse à ta question se trouve sur ma page perso (lien web donné sur la page wiki). Si tu as d'autres questions (pas en rapport avec Wikipedia) tu peux toujours envoyer un courriel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by69.116.236.229 (talk) 11:44, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

1797 Riobamba earthquake
Hi Farhikht, thanks for sorting out some minor things in the article, but I feel that 7 minutes after creation is a little fast to start adding orphan tags. Mikenorton (talk) 15:21, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * You are right, sorry, I'm new on AWB!Farhikht (talk) 15:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Not a problem, I would suggest giving a new article at least a week before adding an orphan tag - I sometimes forget to create incoming links when I create an article, so I find that it can be a useful reminder (although some editors who create articles on plants and the like can get a bit touchy about this as they may never be able to get more than a single incoming link). Cheers, Mikenorton (talk) 15:50, 22 August 2010 (UTC)


 * A very, very, big thank you for this honor! You made my day better! دمت گرم! (Dam-et garm!) you know this totally Persian expression?!Farhikht (talk) 16:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome, Yes I know, مخلصيم Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 07:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Iranians in the Netherlands
Thank you for helping to clean up trivia from this article! There is a lot inserted by some people who are trying to promote themselves and their own groups and activities.

However, I restored part of the information about the Anoosh incident from 1996. This was a major occurrence which continues to be mentioned years later in academic papers. It's a lot more important than some of the other protests and stuff mentioned in that section (which get mentioned once in the news and then forgotten).

Cheers, cab (call) 11:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I didn't know that this incident was so important, thanks for restore this section. I saw that you removed the promotional part of this section (again on Radio Zamaneh activities!), cheers.Farhikht (talk) 11:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, seeNew admin school/Rollback. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Tiptoety talk 17:03, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Mahmoud Shoolizadeh
Dear Farhikht, with all due respect, and as an Iranian, I wanted to personally communicate with you. I just wanted to give you some important information about these films, the real reasons why I believe these films have to remain on wikipedia. Let me give you a few examples: The film series The Textbooks, was a documentary series made that was critical of the textbooks published in Iran, interviews with experts made the film conclude that the ministry of education in Iran has to remove the political bias in school books, and change its twisted views in history and religious books. Needless to say, the film was immediately banned and sent straight to the archives. Many years later, another reseacher and equality advocate in Iran read about this film ON WIKIPEDIA, and decided to go and look for it in the archives. The film was used as a base for his research, which is now causing reform in Iran's education system. Another reason, the film The World Intellectuals is a film that was also immediately banned. The film talked about the philosophy of the german poet and philosopher Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, it was a liberal (roshanfekr) film. The reason why IRIB banned it was, and i quote: "The only philosophy is that of Islam". Mr. Farhikht, Film makers, artists, and activists are having an extremely hard time in Iran, and have a harder time communicating through internet, lets not make it harder for them. Pouya sh (talk) 17:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Dear Pouya, I didn't nominate the article because of its content, the only reason was lack of references, be sure. And if you want to save them try to find some reliable sources, otherwise it will be deleted by other Wikipedians, as we say in Persian: دیر و زود داره اما سوخت و سوز نداره. Good Luck.Farhikht (talk) 11:27, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Babak Esmaeili
BLP PROD doesn't apply as the article was created in February 2010, i.e. it predates the new rule. I've converted your BLP PROD into a plain PROD: if it is uncontested for a week, it will be deleted. Fences &amp;  Windows  19:54, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Javad alizadeh.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Javad alizadeh.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK submission
Hi Farhikht, Can you please clarify what "a humor" means in your Javad Alizadeh hook and article? Thanks, Ericoides 14:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. If you mean "cartoons" please change all instances of "a humor" to "cartoon" or "cartoons". I thought that was what you meant but I was not certain. Once you have done this the hook and the article will make sense. Best wishes, Ericoides 14:56, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, I'm copy-editing it now, so please do not edit it for about 10 minutes so there are no edit conflicts. Thanks, Ericoides 15:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I've finished now, and I hope the article is a bit clearer. Ericoides 15:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Dear Farhikht:

This is in regard to a page I contributed a couple years ago. The Title of the page was/is Sima_Yari and it is about one of the prominent Iranian Poets. I recently learned that this poet is nominated for 2010 Literature Nobel prize by a few organizations in Iran and by quite a few Scholars around the world (All Farsi speaking). I logged in to Edit the page with this new information and noticed the page was deleted. I respectfully request the page to be restored. Thank you. Sincerely, Nematg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nematg(talk • contribs) 12:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

OTRS
Regarding your OTRS ticket on several images, can you translate the Farsi(?)? Please respond on my talk page as soon as possible. 00:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Javad Alizadeh
The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Farewell-baghdad-poster.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Farewell-baghdad-poster.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Farewell Baghdad
Nice expansion work on this article!  Lugnuts  (talk) 18:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you Lugnuts! Nice user page!Farhikht (talk) 14:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Daniel Quinn (Paul Aster character)
Hello Farhikht. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Daniel Quinn (Paul Aster character), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Redirect is not broken. Thank you. Courcelles 16:04, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Mohsen Emadi deletion
Hi, wondering where the discussions are up to with Mohsen Emadi. You posted a potential deletion tag on his page. There is no info on the article talk page as to why it should be deleted. Please advise. Thanks Span (talk) 14:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, please go to this page.Farhikht (talk) 14:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Musharaf Bangash ‎ ‎
Hello Farhikht. Can you read Urdu? Could you look at this AfD, please? Thanks. --Vejvančický(talk | contribs) 14:33, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry, I don't know Urdo, but its alphabet is very similar to that of Persian. I tried to find reliable source for the article but I couldn't.Farhikht (talk) 13:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your effort, Farhikht. I've checked some of the promising websites (in Urdu) with the help of G-translator, unfortunately without much success. All we have now is the terrible news about his kidnapping. Best regards. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I asked a friend (User:Spada2) to participate in the afd, maybe he could help. Best.Farhikht (talk) 17:22, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Elnaz Rezaei Ghale Chi
Hello Farhikht, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion ofElnaz Rezaei Ghale Chi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not previously been deleted via a deletion discussion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Thparkth (talk) 01:52, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Please ignore the patronizing tone of that templated message from Twinkle. The issue is that the article has never been to AfD before. In fact, the article has never been deleted before for any reason. If it was deleted before at AfD with a slightly different name, so that this article is a blatant recreation, please re-tag just put a note in the talk page and re-tag it with G4, maybe with the previous article name in the edit summary. Cheers, Thparkth (talk) 01:55, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, previously it was deleted at AfD with a different name: Elnaz Rezaei Ghalechi. Just check the talk page ofUser:Metabon: No-one can stop him/her of the recreation of the article! I will try it again. Thanks.Farhikht (talk) 16:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

mani nouri page
Hi Farhikht, i am new here, i don't know what to say exactly, but i like to say that my article is about a real person, a real actor in Iran that i think a lot of people know about and have memories from him. Such as zizigooloo that almost everybody knows. So i really don't know how it works, but i would really appreciate it if you could help me keep this article. if you search his name in Iranian, you can find out many articles about his works and some of his serials have even pages in here such as ZIZIGOOLOO:http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%82%D8%B5%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C_%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%87%E2%80%8C%D8%AA%D8%A7 KHANEYE MA: http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87_%D9%85%D8%A7

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. —Preceding unsigned comment added byAlikhezrayi (talk • contribs) 03:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Ali, in fact I searched his name in Persian, but couldn't find good sources about his works. Please help us and find some of them, and add them to the article. If you do this the article will be kept. Be sure that no-one can delete an article with good and reliable sources. Best.Farhikht (talk) 11:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Farhikht, i appreciate your answer, but as i said in the discussion, iranact.com, sourehcinema.com, us.imdb.com, these are reliable sources. His works are still popular in Iran, but i will try to find some more links. I don't know howlong has it been that you live outside of Iran, but from whoever in Iran you ask, i promise you that they all know Zizigooloo, Khaneye ma, tehran 11, morabaye shirin. I don't know but perhaps you have watched his movies as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alikhezrayi (talk• contribs) 00:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

qualified reviewer?
I think it is necessary to point out some critical points regarding your last posts on iran- and iranian-related issues. After reading your comments and reviewing your actions, it appears that these are not based on extensive research but more of emotional and naive nature. For instance, you mention that you could find any information neither in Persian. May I ask, what sources you are using to gain information? What are the research strategies? Do you have access to reliable archives? These are indeed legitimate questions regarding your qualities as a reviewer and in my opinion should definitely be answered before your next action. As a scientist, I am familiar with the peer-review process for publications. The reviewer himself should be highly qualified (a peer) in a specific field of research. What are your special achievements? What guarantees the value of your contributions? I can surely claim, that at least in science, the number of writings in wikipedia is not an accepted qualification. I hope that you can provide credible proof for your qualifications and that you reveal your research strategies and resources. Please, don't get me wrong, I do this for you... — Precedingunsigned comment added by DrPhosphorus (talk •contribs) 16:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Sanandaj
Sorry, I'm missing something. Forgot to do what? As I understand it, it would be ideal if Sanandej redirected toSanandaj, an article about the town or city, but there is no such article, so both redirect to the airport.-- SPhilbrick  T  13:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that an admin has deleted the article. You have to restore it.Farhikht (talk) 14:33, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I just checked the deletion log for Sanandaj, and found no such entry. Do you know if it was spelled differently? Do you know when it was deleted? If you have the exact date, I can look in the deletion log around the time to see some other spelling was used.-- SPhilbrick  T  14:43, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sure that it existed under the name of Sanandaj (around 5 Dec the article exited in the complete form). Then a user moved it to Sina, Kurdistan. Please see here.Farhikht (talk) 14:54, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Sina, Kurdistan is just a redirect. I don't see any evidence that it ever contained any substantive content. I'm happy to try to help, but I'm not finding the content relating to the city.-- SPhilbrick  T  17:19, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reza Narimizadeh
Apologies, I've corected my error on the above. Paste Let’s have a chat. 21:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Best.Farhikht (talk) 17:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Professional
Hi, we need your professional eyes on arsames (band) article, I believe its a hoax and fails WP:Music, thanks.Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 12:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Spada, and thanks for informing me. I check regularlythis page, just put the article there, so others can participate in the discussion. For this entry I will do it.Farhikht (talk) 11:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

tabriz
با سلام

چرا بخش مربوط به بازار تبریز را در مقاله تبریز حذف می کنید؟ بازار تبریز مقاله جداگانه دارد و در این مقاله فقط اشاره کوچکی به آن شده و موردی ندارد یک سوال دیگر اینکه فارسی نوشتم از لحاظ قانونی مشکلی دارد؟ Bakhish2010 (talk) 07:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * سلام، فارسی نوشتن در صفحات بحث مشکلی ندارد، اما ترجیحا انگلیسی بنویسید بهتر است. بازار تبریز مقاله جداگانه دارد، تنها در آن مقاله میتوان اینفوباکس را استفاده کرد، و هیچ نیازی ندارد که در صفحه تبریز از اینفوباکسی استفاده کرد که متعلق به بازار تبریز است. همان اشاره کوچک کافی است چون خواننده میتواند با کلیک بر روی آن به مقاله برود و اطلاعات لازم را دریافت کند. البته میتوانید چند جمله بیشتر درباره بازار در مقاله تبریز بیاورید اما اینفوباکس را به هیچ وجه نمیتوان استفاده کرد.Farhikht(talk) 21:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

List
Many thanks for your note.--Epeefleche (talk) 13:12, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Push Pin?
Can you add a push pin for Sidi Bouzid in the map you added for Death of Mohamed Bouazizi? Glennconti(talk) 00:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I can't. You may ask a member of Geography Project.Farhikht (talk) 16:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Article rewrite
How, exactly, do you propose the article be rewritten? Lara 14:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Death of Neda Agha Soltan is a good example of this kind of article. Also I think that we should create a new infobox for Neda, and the others who died during protests.Farhikht (talk) 17:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I disagree. Where did these "Death of" articles come from? They don't follow a logical encyclopedic format. The articles are biographies. They should be formatted (and named) as biographies. Can you please direct me to the MOS page for this format? Lara  17:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, with regard to Neda Agha-Soltan, apparent contradictions aside, the layout of the article isn't logical. You unilaterally moved Mohamed Bouazizi without any discussion, directing editors to the talk page for your explanation despite the fact that you never posted anything to it. Without some sort of logical reasoning, supported by at least a guideline, I'm moving the title back to his name, as it is a biography. Please avoid making any further unilateral changes to the article.Talk:Death of Mohamed Bouazizi is where you need to start from now on. Lara  18:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

George Malek-Yonan and Milton Malek-Yonan
I am just letting you know that I declined the nomination of George Malek-Yonan and Milton Malek-Yonan for deletion, two pages you tagged for deletion, because of the following concern: The articles make credible assertion of importance and/or significance. Thank you. Zayya 00:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Please provide reliable sources for these articles, you can't decline an AfD when the discussion is running. Note that in most instance, the admins closed these debates. See WP:NACD for non-admin closure.Farhikht(talk) 11:33, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Abdolreza Razmjoo
با سلام خدمت تو دوست عزیز،اولا ببخشید که فارسی نوشتم .و بعد منظور من منابعی بود که در تاریخ 22 اضافه کردم نه به دلیل بودن مقاله فارسی,ممنون و متشکرم. ما زیاران چشم یاری داشتیم Farkoh (talk) 01:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Dear Mr JohnCD I have been added some references after the 21st day of January to my article in Wikipedia.Regarding this I wanted to request for restoring and recreating my post in your site. In addition, this article under the name of عبدالرضا رزمجو currently exists in the Persian section of Wikipedia. All the Best Farkoh (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC) — — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farkoh (talk • contribs) سلام دوست عزیزم. متأسفم که مقاله هنرمند مورد علاقه تان حذف شده است. اما مطمئن باشید کسی اینجا از روی غرض ورزی چنین نکرده است. مشکل تنها فقدان منابع مستقل بوده است. در هر صورت طبق قوانین ویکیپدیا شما میتوانید مقاله را بازنویسی کنید، مشروط بر اینکه حتما منابع مستقلی به آن اضافه کنید. در صورتی که مقاله را با همان منابع پیشین یا مشابه آن بنویسید متأسفانه باید بگویم که مقاله (بدون رأیگیری) حذف سریع خواهد شد. تلاش شما را برای معرفی فرهنگ ایرانی میستایم. با احترام.Farhikht (talk) 11:08, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Abdolreza Razmjoo
The article author asked on my talk page for the article to be restored, because he added references after the delete !votes were made on 20 Jan. I have checked his edits after that point, and the only ones which might possibly affect the outcome are:
 * changing the link "Shore Kodaki"
 * from http://www.soundunwound.com/music/abdolreza-razmjoo/20547200 Soundunwound.com
 * to http://www.songtexte.com/artist/abdolreza-razmjoo-6bd0e6ca.html Songtexte


 * adding two sections:


 * See also
 * Music of Iran
 * List of Iranian musicians


 * Sources and Further reading


 * Weekly magazine Chelcheragh,iran(February 2002)
 * Nezafati,Iraj. "Kermanshah music", Kermanshah: Taq Bostan Publications, 1998. ISBN 964-5551-11

Would these changes have affected your delete opinion? Please reply below here - I will watch this page.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I verified the new sources in the "Further reading" section. The first one is from Chelcheragh, a tabloid weakly which its primary target group is young higher educated people. I can't verify the depth of coverage but I think thatChelcheragh can't be considered a reliable source for music articles. The second is probably a history of music inKermanshah, published by a local book publisher and written by a local journalist born in 1976 according to his biohere. The writer claimed in his biography that he is head of the "current event" service inKayhan newspaper which do not make him an expert on the topic. So I think that the article still fails WP:MUSIC. Best.Farhikht (talk) 11:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

FYI
Hi. You nominated an article for AfD some time ago that seems to have been tainted by !vote solicitation outside of wp in an effort to gain support to !vote against you. I came across this, as the editor Jigsawnovich is currently involved in AfD discussions that I am involved in, and I had questions as to possible sockpuppetry. I thought this might interest you.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It related to this AfD that you were involved in, as well.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I will nominate the articles soon.Farhikht (talk) 19:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. When you recently edited Simin Daneshvar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

مقالهٔ «سیمین دانشور»
سلام، دربارهٔ نام کشور، همان قبلی درست‌تر بود، چون در هنگام تولد وی (۱۹۲۱) نام ایران در انگلیسی آن بوده‌است. --Z 02:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * مرسی. حق با شماست، یکی از ویژگیهای عمر دراز هم همین است! البته عمر پرثمری داشتند خانم دانشور! تصحیحش میکنم.Farhikht (talk) 11:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * بله! ممنون، پیشاپیش نوروز مبارک --Z 22:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * مرسی. بر شما هم مبارک نوروز باستانی. زنده باشید.

Masoumeh Ebtekar
Farhikht has edited a change made on masoumeh ebtekar's page on the subtitle "questions on plagiarism ". Ebtekar is a reknown Professor at our university and does not deserve this paragraph and the subtitle. many of the footnotes and references to this paragraph and in the text are not available now. she has now many ISI articles (scopus)and her students have obtained national awards and this is not a correct representation of her status.I think the paragraph should be removed, or reduced in size or at least subtitle removed. also several references about the American Embassy are from elaine Sciolino all from one source and all very negative about her I dont think this is fair. reformists like her are already under alot of pressure from the system and this biased references from one source is not fair.the ref about shooting Americans is not reliable yet wiki editors allow it to stand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by98.158.113.64 (talk) 05:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comment. The paragraph on plagiarism can't be removed as a reliable source (Nature) covered it. But on the other issue, I invite you to post a commenthere, and don't forget to discuss the issue on the Ebtekar's talk page here. Please consider finding reliable sources (journals, newspapers, books) that support your claim. And before doing this please take a look at this article. Best.Farhikht (talk) 11:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Abdoreza Razmjoo, again
The indefatigable Farkoh has come up with another source - see User talk:JohnCD. I can't make much of it through Google Translate - it looks as though he did something on the soundtrack of a film. Do you think it helps with notability? JohnCD (talk) 22:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * As you pointed out, the article talks about an upcoming TV movie called Scarface (not the onedirected by Brian De Palma!). According to it, Razmjou did the soundtrack. I just look for the movie's title on the internet without finding something interesting. So I do not think that he can pass notability considering this article. Just for fun, I think they did this article for Wikipedia, because half of it talks about Razmjou and his career as a musician, which is weird!Farhikht (talk) 07:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Pantea Rahmani
Hello Farhikht. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pantea Rahmani, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Much better looking sources in this version. It's not very spammy either, though may well need a rewrite. Needs to go to AFD again if you think it should be deleted.''' Thank you. Ged UK  11:40, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello Ged UK. No problem, I will go to AfD. Thank you.Farhikht (talk) 17:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Khosro Naghed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism!!!
What's your major in wikipedia? Only want yourself editing in wikipedia? I know laws and I edit under laws. You can seeUnited States presidential election, 2012 or Iranian presidential election, 2009 for example. PLEASE DON'T WANT ONLY THAT'S ON YOURSELF MIND. ALL CAN EDIT IN WIKIPEDIA. Tabarez (talk) 21:21, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, what you do is vandalism. I told you so many times to read policies. Ask yourself why you have so many complaints on your talk page. All of them are wrong?Farhikht (talk) 21:26, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I have reasons for my edits and you?? Tabarez (talk) 21:29, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Edit war on Iranian presidential election, 2013
Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Iranian presidential election, 2013.

While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.

Continued edit warring on Iranian presidential election, 2013 or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 21:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello. But what I reverted was vandalism on that page. I reported the user and you can see my warnings on his talk page.Farhikht (talk) 21:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It's not clear that it is vandalism. If there is any doubt if your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, (as in this case) please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing.  Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions.  Often times, requesting page protection is a much better course of action. Toddst1 (talk) 22:04, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I considered these two edits as blanking: 1, 2.Farhikht (talk) 22:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Why the names must be incomplete? Why he deleted my edits in other sections? Tabarez (talk) 10:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Thank you for making a report about onAdministrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 22:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The fact is that I warned him as you can see on his talk page so I ignored his good faith. I asked him to read policies which he didn't accept. I'm tired of checking all his edits, as you can see some of them are useful and some of them are not constructive.Farhikht (talk) 22:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I have reported User:Tabarez to WP:ANI for among other things edit warring and WP:OWN, as WP:ANI seems to be the proper place for it. Thomas.W (talk) 10:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

You have beenblocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did atIranian presidential election, 2013. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 14:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC) After discussion with, it appears this block was unnecessary and I have unblocked you.Toddst1 (talk) 15:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Election colours
Hi! I also add the sources for Ghalibaf,Velayati andHaddad]. Please add these too. Thanks. Tabarez (talk) 17:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi. I answered you on the talk page of the article, here.Farhikht (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * به نظر من اگه اینطوریه همون دو کاندیدایی هم که رنگ دارن رنگشونو پاک کنیم بهتره چون الان مقاله اوج بی سلیقگیه. درضمن همونطور که خودت گفتی معمولا رنگ ها نشانه ی حزب های کاندیداها هست وهمونطور که خودتم باز گفتی ممکنه یه کاندیدا توسط هیچ حزب یا چند حزب حمایت بشه پس این موضوع منتفیه بعدش من فکر میکنم باتوجه به اتفاقات انتخابات قبلی کمتر کاندیدایی پیدابشه که رنگشو علنی کنه پس تاروز انتخابات مقاله باید اینطور زشت بمونه؟ بعدش شما فکر میکنید کاندیدایی مثل غرضی که حتی ستاد نداره بیاد رنگ معرفی کنه؟ این موضوع رو حل کنید. سپاس به خاطر کمکتتون. Tabarez (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * چرا زشت؟ وقتی حزبی رنگ دارد باید از رنگش استفاده کنیم و وقتی ندارد به جایش "نه" میگذاریم. در اینباکس هم این مطلب ذکر شده. اصولاً مقاله پارامتری به نام "قشنگی" ندارد، بلکه باید بر اساس شیوه نامه ویکیپدیا نوشته شده باشند.

WP:MOS

وقتی کاندیدایی رنگ ندارد ما که نمیتوانیم از آسمان رنگ اضافه کنیم. Farhikht (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * یعنی همه ی کاندیداهای انتخاباتای کشورهای دیگه رنگ دارند!!! اصلا رنگ فقط محدود به چند کشوره. خواهشن زیبایی مقاله رو هم به اصول کاریتون اضافه کنید حتی اگه جزو قوانین ویکیپدیا نباشه. خواهشن Tabarez (talk) 17:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC).
 * به نظرم شما معیار زیبایی را کلا کنار بگذارید، مثلاً در همین مقاله ای که درباره روسای جمهور نوشته اید افراد را به دو قسمت تقسیم کرده اید: محافظه کار و اصلاح طلب. در حالی که جریان رفورمیست از سال 2000 به وجود آمده. دلیلش هم این است که زیباتر است حتماً. حالا ببینید چقدر جنگ ویرایشی سر آن مقاله در روزهای آینده درست میکنید.Farhikht (talk) 17:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * تاحالا فقط شما بودید که به مقالات گیر میدین. در باره ی اون مقاله هم من نظرخواهی کردم کسی جواب نداده جواب منطقی باشه می پذیرم الانم از شما خواهش دارم یا مقاله رو مثل قبل کنید یا کلا رنگ رو از مقاله حذف کنید. متشکر. Tabarez (talk) 18:00, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * عرض کردم قبلاً، اصولاً اینجا چیزی به اسم رأیگیری نداریم. قوانین مشخص است. بهتر است وقت بگذارید و آنها را بخوانید، بخصوص قوانین اصلی. مقالات هم متعلق به من و شما نیست که بستگی به سلیقه ما داشته باشد. اگر کاندیدایی رنگ داشته باشد در اینباکس رنگ اضافه میکنیم، اگر نداشته باشد به جایش "نه" میگذاریم. اگر قشنگی مقاله مهم بود در این صورت چرا اصولاً جا هم برای رنگ و هم برای "نه" گذاشته شده است؟ اگر شما فکر میکنیداین شیوه درست نیست بروید در صفحه اینباکس و آنجا مشکل را مطرح کنید. درباره جواب "منطقی" هم اصولاً شاید چیزی اینجا منطقی به نظر نرسد اما مشکلی نیست چون قرار است بر اساس قواعد ویکیپدیا بنویسیم. یکی ش همین رأیگیری، که در اینجا نداریم. بروید بخش مقالات حذف شده میبینید که گاه ده نفر رأی به حفظ یک مقاله داده اند و دو نفر رأی به حذف، اما در نهایت مقاله حذف شده است. حال آنکه "منطق" میگوید که باید مقاله حفظ شود. اینها قوانین ویکیپدیاست.Farhikht (talk) 18:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * در ضمن، شما برای ویرایش کردن متن را دیلیت میکنید، سپس مقاله را سیو میکنید، بعد مطلب را در ماوس کپی میکنید و دوباره به مقاله اضافه میکنید. من اگر بخواهم سختگیری کنم باید همه این ویرایشهای شما را حذف کنم، چون شما تاریخچه مقاله را خراب میکنید، بعدها اگر کسی مقاله را چک کند، انگار شما آن مطالب را اضافه کرده اید، در حالی که اینطور نیست. شما با این روش ابداعی تان حقوق مشارکت کنندگان اصلی مقاله را پایمال میکنید.Farhikht (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * همه ی صحبت های شما درست ولی یه نکته هایی رو بگم مفیده. شما هم بهتره اطلاعات سیاسی خودتون رو بالا ببرید. ریفورمیسم (اصلاح طلبی) از سال 1988 با تشکیل مجمع روحانیون مبارز آغاز و باانتخاب آقای خاتمی به اوج خودش رسید. پس بهتره شما هم درباره موضوع ها اطلاع کسب کنید. دومن میشه منبع رنگ انتخاباتی آقای روحانی رو بدید چون من ندیدم جایی که رنگ ستاد ایشون صورتی باشه و سوم بهتر نیست از ویکیپدیای فارسی پیروی کنیم درباره این موضوع؟ همچنین تلاشتون برای حفظ قوانین رو می ستایم. Tabarez (talk) 18:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * با اجازتون فعلا رنگ هارو حذف میکنم تا تکلیف نهایی مشخص بشه. Tabarez (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * تکلیف نهایی چه چیزی مشخص بشود؟ من این همه برای شما به فارسی توضیح دادم باز حرف خودتان را میزنید. در همان ویکی فارسی هم مثل اینجاست و سه تا از نامزدها رنگ دارند. ضمن اینکه نه مقالات را با هم مقایسه کنید نه با ویکی های دیگر. ما درباره قوانین ویکیپدیای انگلیسی حرف میزنیم. شاید آنها قوانینشان فرق دارد. در ادامه هم بحث را در همان صفحه مقاله و به انگلیسی ادامه دهید. مقاله فهرست روسای جمهور هم همچنانکه گفتم واگردانی شد.Farhikht (talk) 19:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)