User talk:Faridani

Little context in Poisson hidden markov model
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Poisson hidden markov model, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Poisson hidden markov model is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Poisson hidden markov model, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:40, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I have restored that page and moved it to Poisson hidden Markov model (with a capital "M". Michael Hardy (talk) 15:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Poisson regression in R
Added to R implementations

Proposed deletion of Modeling point processes in R
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Modeling point processes in R, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * This page is extremely specific and is possibly the only article on a single module of a language on Wikipedia.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Melelaswe (talk) 03:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Motto of the Day
Hi there, Faridani! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –p joe f (talk • contribs) 17:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Systems
Hi Faridani, thanks for joining the WikiProject Systems. If there is something I can do just let me know. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 11:29, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Marcel Douwe Dekker It is my pleasure, let me know how I can be helpful --Max Allen G (talk) 00:53, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I will, thanks. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 12:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Modeling point processes in R
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Modeling point processes in R. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Modeling point processes in R. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Operations Research
WikiProject Operations Research, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Operations Research (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Operations Research during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  20:37, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Poissonregression.gif


A tag has been placed on File:Poissonregression.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  21:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Pjoef/Sandbox/WPs&action=submit
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 10:09, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:User OR
Template:User OR, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User OR and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template:User OR during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —⁠andrybak (talk) 18:42, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Art, Technology, and Culture Lecture Series


The article Art, Technology, and Culture Lecture Series has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lack of notability and sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)