User talk:Farmersalmanac

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 06:21, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Buy the Farm LLC
A tag has been placed on Buy the Farm LLC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 06:21, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

John Wayne Gacy
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to John Wayne Gacy. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doc9871 (talk) 08:19, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * P.S.: As a general "rule of thumb", YouTube should not be considered a reliable source, as content is routinely removed from this site for copyright violations - which is exactly what WP wants to avoid. Imdb, like WP, is also not considered a reliable source, precisely because of the nature of both projects: pretty much anyone can edit them without providing reliable sources.  Hope this helps a little, and happy editing, Farmersalmanac! Doc9871 (talk) 08:28, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to John Wayne Gacy. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Do not lie in your edit summaries to claim you are removing vandalism or references to Gacy being a sexy man. Those are clearly lies. We DO NOT list future films. Please try to understand that. Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:33, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on John Wayne Gacy. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:36, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


 * One last warning before a block: When you know that the material you are adding to an article is disputed by several other editors, do not simply re-add the material back in. In particular, do not tell them to "use the talk page", when they have, and you haven't. If you do that again, I will block you from editing.  Discuss this at Talk:John Wayne Gacy, and gain consensus before re-adding anything. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war&#32;at John Wayne Gacy. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Floquenbeam (talk) 21:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

When this block expires, please visit Talk:John Wayne Gacy and gain consensus for this addition. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC)