User talk:Farrahmarie/Social media marketing/Hparks2024 Peer Review

Peer Review
Hi! Here was my feedback on your article for the peer review:

Lead: I like the lead a lot, it's straight to the point and starts out by defining what social media marketing is. The paragraph as a whole is very concise, although I think what will be discussed in the article should be outlined more clearly.

Content: I think that the information given in each section is pretty solid, it just needs to be updated. More examples within the past few years could be added since in a few of the sections, the most recent information is from 5 years ago.

Tone and Balance: The tone throughout the article seems pretty neutral, so I would just keep that in mind when bringing in any new information and references.

Sources and References: There are a ton of good sources presented throughout the article, if anything I would say try to add some that discuss more recent studies or information found about the different sections.

Organization: I think the organization and layout of the article is great, and not many changes would need to be made to that. the different sections and subsections are clearly marked and it is easy to jump around to them if needed.

Images and Media: I only saw five images throughout the whole article, so I think you could probably add more images of things or people that the article references. There are also a picture in the influencer marketing section of an influencer that seems to be from a while ago, so when you update that section you could replace the picture as well to keep it relevant. Hparks2024 (talk) 00:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)