User talk:Farzanfa007

September 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to West Block Blues, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Coderzombie (talk) 10:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club (September 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Manjappada_Kerala_Blasters_Fan_Club Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Manjappada_Kerala_Blasters_Fan_Club reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 13:17, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Please do not disrupt the Pages for protection page by placing your requests in the wrong section. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 10:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * And you did not wait for the draft to be given the green light..it is now back in draftspace. Please work on it before republishing. Consider this a warning. Lectonar (talk) 10:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tinkerhub
Hello, Farzanfa007,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Tinkerhub for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Coderzombie (talk) 09:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club (September 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Manjappada_Kerala_Blasters_Fan_Club Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Manjappada_Kerala_Blasters_Fan_Club reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club (September 12)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Manjappada_Kerala_Blasters_Fan_Club Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: That's enough. You just added back the social media websites and resubmitted, thus violating WP:ELMINOFFICIAL.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Manjappada. Coderzombie (talk) 17:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You cannot create new accounts to continue your disruptive editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Unblock Request
I have decided not to submit any further unblock requests at this time. I had hoped that my contributions over the past three years would have been taken into consideration and I am disappointed that things did not turn out as expected. I know there are no special considerations for good faith edits. But I'm disappointed because my situation is very unique. However, I am ready to wait for six months. Farzanfa007 (talk) 15:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry to see this, Akevsharma. One thing to note is that you're only blocked from the English Wikipedia: you're still welcome to edit on other Wikimedia projects, for instance the Hindi Wikipedia or the Simple English Wikipedia. If you spend the next few months making constructive edits on other Wikipedias, it's more likely that your standard offer appeal will ultimately be successful. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * , thank you for your support in this condition. May I ask if I should be contributing to Wikipedia using this account or my other account, ? Also, if this account gets unblocked, what will happen to my other account which has more than 5000 positive contributions? My plan is to mainly focus on editing football-related articles, which I worked on during my earlier days on English Wikipedia. Is it correct to assume that every notable article on English Wikipedia is also eligible for an article on Simple English Wikipedia? Farzanfa007 (talk) 07:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:SOCKBLOCK says that you should usually use your original account unless you have a good reason not to. If you want to use the other account, maybe ask the blocking administrator (Vanjagenije) for permission first. (Unfortunately it's not possible to merge two accounts together.) On notability, the Simple English notability guideline looks almost identical to our GNG, so the standards should be very similar. I don't have much experience with Simple English Wikipedia, though, so you might want to ask there (e.g. at simple:Wikipedia:Simple talk) if you have any more questions. Best of luck! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Your suggestion ? Farzanfa007 (talk) 09:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * About what?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Vanjagenije, Should I use the original account to make edits on other Wikimedia projects or can I use ? Farzanfa007 (talk) 00:31, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't know the policies of other projects, they are independent from English Wikipedia. Here, in English Wikipedia, blocks are issued to persons, not to accounts. If you, as a person, are not blocked, then you can use any account as long as the use is not WP:ILLEGIT. I guess the situation is similar in other projects.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:31, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I will be editing from Akevsharma. Farzanfa007 (talk) 13:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Unblock Request

 * From a CU perspective, I see no evidence of socking in the currently available data. I'll leave it to somebody else to decide if they want to unblock, but you can consider the obligation to consult with a CU per WP:CUBL to have been fulfilled. RoySmith (talk) 16:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll wait for Vanja to given his opinion, but as far as WP:GAB and WP:SO are concerned, I think this appeal hits the mark.-- Ponyo bons mots 18:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I have no objections to unblocking.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:56, 14 September 2023 (UTC)