User talk:FashionFoward

Hi. I noticed you've said you can't get the sources to function correctly – if you let me know what you want to do I'd be more than happy to help. First off, however, you'll have to find exact sources – such as the issue and date of a newspaper in which Runway was covered, or a website detailing it – as stating "USPTO: The United States Trademark Office" is not really sufficient. You may wish to take a look at the following guidelines: If you've got any questions, feel free to leave me a message – either write back here (I have this page on my watchlist) or leave me a message on my talk page. Cheers, Fribbulus Xax (talk) 22:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:RS (reliable sources)
 * WP:CITE (citations)
 * WP:V (verifiability)
 * WP:N (notability)

Runway Magazine
FashionForward. I'm glad that you decided to work on wikifying the page Runway Magazine by adding links. May I suggest, though, that you review WP:LINK and reconsider this edit that you made? I think that most users are familiar with these countries, and that the content of the articles on these countries aren't particularly relevant to the contents of the Runway Magazine article. Thanks. Shanata (talk) 07:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Runway Magazine
I have nominated Runway Magazine, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Runway Magazine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fences &amp;  Windows  18:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Runway Magazine
A tag has been placed on Runway Magazine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:34, 29 June 2010 (UTC)