User talk:FastApproachingDoom

Conflict resolution
Please read the dialogue below and respond at my Talk Page (at this link: User talk:Joseph A. Spadaro ). Thank you. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 22:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Request for administrator help
I'd like to request the assistance of an administrator. Thank you. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 00:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Please include your request when you use adminhelp. Mkdw talk 03:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi. Are you an admin?  Can you assist me, please?  Let me know.   Thanks.    Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 04:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, how can I help? Mkdw talk 04:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'd like to know if you can intervene or advise.  This matter concerns another editor here on Wikipedia.  I believe that he must be "new" because he has a red link user name.  If I am reading his edit contributions history correctly, he only started on Wikipedia about a month ago (January 16, 2014).  I also noticed that an inordinate number of his edits are him reverting other people.  His User Name is User:TobiisNOTmadara1291.  In any event, there is a series of 4 or 5 articles (about the death penalty).  They are all formatted the same exact way, in a consistent manner.  And they have been that way for many years.  On one article (or perhaps 2), he went in and changed the formatting.  So, he changed the format; I changed it back.  He changed it; I changed it back.  Etc.  I never kept count, but it is probably 2 or 3 reverts so far.  I don't want any hassles, so I am hoping some disinterested party can step in.  I am sure you can look at the Edit Histories; you can see the edits; you can see the edit summaries.  By the way, these are articles with very little editing done, so all of the edits I am referring to should be way at the top of the history.  He made the last edits, reverting mine.  I didn't want to go in and violate some "three revert rule" or what have you.  So, I didn't revert him.  Rather, I posted this Admin Help Request.  These articles have been around for years; and the format has stayed the same for years.  Until he came along.  The articles in question are: List of offenders executed in the United States in 2013 and List of offenders executed in the United States in 2014.  There are other articles in the series, but I think he has not edited them yet (I believe).  What do you suggest?  Thanks.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 04:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Joseph A. Spadaro, you're a very experienced editor here on Wikipedia. Even more than I. I would like to see you make an attempt to talk it out with this editor on a talk page before a third party becomes involved. If the fruits of those discussions are bare then please let me know, otherwise, User talk:TobiisNOTmadara1291 would probably be a good place to talk about how best to move forward. Mkdw talk 16:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Requested participation
Your participation is requested at Talk:List of offenders executed in the United States in 2013. Thank you, Mkdw talk 16:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your edits to 2013 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
Re: my reversion of your incorrect edits, see http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinions.aspx for the actual case names, and the opinions themselves for the proper way to refer to the respective parties. postdlf (talk) 23:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

2020 List of landmark court decisions in the United States clean up
You added the "Fixing This Article" section at the List of landmark court decisions in the United States talk page at April 18, 2020. I responded to it. Can you please add your answers and thoughts to my questions and proposals? Thanks in advance. --P3Y229 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)