User talk:FasterPussycatWooHoo

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
Thanks, LittleOldMe.FasterPussycatWooHoo 13:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Tokusatsu
The article that you nominated for speedy deletion does not appear to meet any of the speedy deletion criteria. If you feel it should be deleted, please follow the nominating procedures at WP:AFD. Thanks. Accurizer 17:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Some policies to review
Hello there. It looks like you may be having a little trouble understanding Wikipedia policies, so I'd like to point out a few you might want to review. I saw your stream of comments on Talk:Tokusatsu, and I think you might want to review a few of our core policies. Your post here violates both our civility policy and our our policy forbidding personal attacks. Referring to other users as "ignorant" or as having "insanely pretentious usernames" is just not appropriate behavior on Wikipedia. Furthermore, you should have a look at the deletion policy to understand why Tokusatsu is not a candidate for speedy deletion. If you have any questions on these policies or need any sort of help, please let me know. Thanks. | Mr. Darcy talk 17:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours
You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating WP:CIVIL here. When your block expires, please do not continue to make uncivil remarks. Nacon kantari 21:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I have unblocked you, as those nasty comments came before I issued the warning above. However, if you continue to launch personal attacks against other users, you will be blocked again. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks Mr. Darcy; looking at your contributions, you seem relatively decent. I have two requests. Firstly, I would like to know how to report Naconkantari for not following policy. Secondly, I would appreciate it if you considered the civility of the tone and repeated "you know nothing", "we know far more", and "... knows far more" style comments and the general "this is our little territory" attitude that led to the warning and malicious block.FasterPussycatWooHoo 11:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Naconkantari didn't do anything wrong, so I wouldn't worry about reporting anything. As for the edits on Tokusatsu and its talk page, I don't see anyone else reaching the level of incivility that you reached in that last edit. You were pushing pretty hard for a deletion or a merge without any sort of consensus or agreement from other editors. That's probably not the best way to go about things. Keep the discussing going on the talk page and try to create changes through consensus, because things like nominating that article for speedy deletion are going to attract negative attention from other admins, who may consider it disruption. Does that help answer your questions? | Mr. Darcy talk 15:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No. Naconkantari did do something wrong in applying a block against policy and this should be on the record with regard to admin. status. Also, repeatedly asserting ignorance without grounding is extremely rude. FasterPussycatWooHoo 18:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The block was not applied against policy. I assumed good faith and wanted to give you an extra chance, but Naconkantari did nothing wrong. I understand why you're upset by it, but pursuing this isn't going to get you any satisfaction. If you really want to try this, go to Requests for arbitration and file a request, but I don't see it going anywhere. | Mr. Darcy talk 19:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I am not particularly upset, rather bored. I note that you have not been around for long, at least with the current user name. Nasty comments, as stated above, the tone of the little clique which is desperately and confusedly trying to introduce another needless import into the English language could have drawn a more even reply. Did you caution any of them against presuming ignorance in others? Did you read the flow on the discussion page and see that they ignored everything said up to my naughty comments, despite the fact that the comments were cogent and literate?FasterPussycatWooHoo 13:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed Community Ban
I suggest you read the entry written at WP:ANI before continuing to assault the editors at Tokusatsu and WP:TOKU. Your constant incivility may very well lead to a community ban from all Japanese related articles. Based on your actions and support for a ban at ANI, User:jgp has begun to revert your edits that are loaded with personal attacks and inaccurate statements. Thank you. Floria L 18:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

That's pretty amusing, considering I haven't said anything that could be considered a personal attack since the above malicious block and block removal. The statements are not inaccurate, certainly a lot more accurate than the many unsourced ones in the article and they are on a discussion page. Well, can't have a discussion, can we? "all Japanese related articles" is a bizarre and extreme intention, to say the least.FasterPussycatWooHoo 11:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

jgp's comment is a real prize, talk about incivility and untruth.FasterPussycatWooHoo 12:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi. While I, myself, do not find that your misconduct warrants an indefinite block at this stage, I appear to be in the minority among admins in that stance. Basically, unless you begin to express yourself with utmost moderation (which need not dilute your points), the aformentioned appeal to indefinitely block you from Wikipedia is almost certain to succeed. El_C 14:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, you could have a little balance in what you identify as misconduct. I recognised my own, but can't see that anywhere else.FasterPussycatWooHoo 11:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * No need to attack me, I'm just passing the message along. No need to try and attack everyone because you feel like it. Just calm down a bit and think it through for a second. [] Floria L 16:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


 * "Just the messenger"? No, an active participant in some kind of strange intimidation game.FasterPussycatWooHoo 11:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The fact that you continue to claim (erroneously) that the earlier block was "malicious" indicates to me that you don't realize that your actions are wrong. If you can't comport yourself in a more civil manner and avoid disruption (adding yourself to a the Wikiproject on Tokusatsu with the explicit aim of attacking the subject is a solid example of disruption), you will be blocked and likely community-banned. | Mr. Darcy talk 04:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

No offense intended, but the actions on both sides of this dispute sound a little weeabooish (in railfan parlance, "foamerish"; in English, overdone and obsessive). Maybe it's time to step back from the computer and practice some Wikilove. &mdash; Rickyrab | Talk 17:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Rickyrab's contribution above is the only one that comes close to balance, but it's a bit too close to a teacher treating the one being bullied and a large group of bullies (many of whom just jumped in for the sake of it or to gain some kind of credit) as if there were some grounds for comparison.FasterPussycatWooHoo 11:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

To avoid a block or ban
I received your comments on my talk page, and let me encourage you again to examine your own actions and how they are motivating others to seek a ban. For example, this edit summary is rude and uncalled for. Referring to other users as ignorant is a violation of the civility policy. And as I noted above, adding yourself to a Wikiproject when you've made it clear that removing that topic from Wikipedia is your primary goal here is disruptive. You need to begin to treat others with more respect, and if you find that you're not happy with the outcome of the talk-page discussions on the topic, go to dispute resolution (starting with mediation). | Mr. Darcy talk 17:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Mr. Darcy, numerous violations of wp:civil and wp:etiquette have been committed by others involved in this. While your role on the noticeboard seems relatively even-handed, I won't concede that your role beyond that has been. Keeping track of all of the personal attacks directed this way, distortions, multiple requests for bureaucratic action which I am not being informed of, and so on, has been rather time-consuming. Wow, I thought it would be possible to contribute to WP without playing social games. Not doing so has certainly left me at a disadvantage here.FasterPussycatWooHoo 10:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, thanks for the reply.FasterPussycatWooHoo 11:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Trying to help
Hi I'm a completely neutral 3rd party (I know NOTHING about any of the topics you edit on!), but am sad to see a relative newbie under fire... and fighting fire with fire. The usual Wikipedia advice is pretty wise and I strongly recommend it. Take a couple of days Wikibreak and come back fresh. You've clearly got a lot to offer, and it would be a real shame if you were put off the project either through Wikistress or being blocked. Please take this friendly advice in the manner in which it is intended. If I can help in any way (other than through sharing my enormous expertise on any article relating to Japan!) please drop me a line. Good luck. --Dweller 10:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Look, the reaction was just ridiculous (I can and did make good arguments for my points, although they were ignored) and, as I said, I was reacting (perhaps over~) to behaviour that is also defined as incivil. I've seen enough of the site to know that the three ANIs (of which I was not notified in a timely fashion even once, i.e. guidelines were violated), block without warning, scope of the suggested actions, attempted 'community ban', etc. are not typical of even hotly contested areas; nor do we see such a quick escalation even for users who are simply out to pick fights, delete pages or, applicable to my own case, disagree with a group who are pushing a strong PoV and feel that they own the relevant subject area. I could say more but won't at this point; no doubt the above will examined for possible points to distort as required.FasterPussycatWooHoo 08:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD: Ctime
FYI, I've nominated ctime for deletion. — Loadmaster 15:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Not that I have any attachment to it, but it does seem worthy. Doesn't appear to have gone through. Well, thanks for the notification. I read the discussion and can't disagree with the result.FasterPussycatWooHoo 14:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)