User talk:Fastroosswrite

Speedy deletion nomination of Old Chinese Markets
Hello Fastroosswrite,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Old Chinese Markets for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Insulam Simia (talk/contribs) 07:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Old Chinese Markets for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Old Chinese Markets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Old Chinese Markets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyros1972 Talk 07:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Ammit has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ammit was changed by Fastroosswrite (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875421 on 2013-06-14T08:24:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)