User talk:Fatehji

replay --> Editor assistance/Requests..Buzzzsherman (talk) 06:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 14:15, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Gotcha.. simple mistake. Hit save before adding in the Tildes. Thanks.Fatehji (talk) 14:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kundalini yoga. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. NJA (t/ c)  20:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * NJA, thank you for your attention to this matter. I appreciate the warning. Actually, I have submitted the user [AtmaPuri] to the Admin boards for edit warring. His edit reverts in the war go back to the exact same posting over a week ago on jan 18th. I have tried to reach consensus in talk pages. Unfruitful. reported to admin and asked for dispute resolution, with little response (case deemed hopeless by one editor's view). Finally I have reported him for edit warring. I have tried my best to edit and shape the page, but he simply doesn't get the spirit of Wikipedia nor the rules of and suggestions for compromise and reaching consensus. Thank you.--Fatehji (talk) 20:50, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes I saw your report. I've protected the page. Please see the comments I made found at the end of your report, as they may be helpful to you. Good luck. NJA (t/ c)  20:55, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, go through WP:DR to get help. For example, maybe post a notice or find editors at WikiProject Health and fitness to assist you. Also, consider asking for help at the most relevant noticeboard. If others have had issues with the editor, you could consider opening a case at Requests for comment. Good luck, NJA (t/ c)  21:08, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Kundalini Yoga warning
Kundalini yoga comes form millenums old Hindu tradition. It was not born 500 years ago, like Sikhism or 50 years ago like the 3HO sekt. You are trying to steal the contents on the article about Kundalini Yoga and put forward the beliefs of 3HO and delete conflicting statements with Hinduism, twist the meaning of references etc. The true knowledge of Kundalini yoga is protected by Shiva in Hindu Sanathan Dharma. Long time ago there lived a deamon named Tarkasur. He was so powerfull that he conquered all the three worlds; the heaven, hell and earth and by the boon of Brahma, he could only be killed by the son of Shiva. Shiva was a brahmacharija and so Tarkasur belived that he is immortal. When Shiva announced his marriage, Tarkasur realized, that his end is comming near and wanted to stop the marriage. However, his Guru strongly advised him against the interference. The consequences of his interference would be so severe after his death, that his death alone would seem like nothing. Tarkasur listened and did not confront Shiva. When Rama was confronting Ravana, even before the final battle, he offered Ravana peace to end the hostilities. The patiences of God is very grand. Fateh, we have met many times before and always you were up to no good. Anybodies edits on the page of Kundalini Yoga, which are not in line with the will of God, lead directly to hell. Whoever feels confident enough to know what that is, is free to make them. For you however, is this THE LAST WARNING! If you think you can not be cursed in the grain of sand on the beach of an ocean in your next life, you are mistaken. HARA HARA MAHADEV! JAYA SHIV SHANKAR! Atmapuri (talk) 20:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * This is the funniest personal attack I've ever seen on wikipedia. It should be in a hall of fame or something for downright stupid ways to go about affecting change in the wikizone. Simonm223 (talk) 00:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Absoulte comedy gold. Please retract your request at WP:AN/I so we can see if any more hilarity can be squeezed out of Atmapuri  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nefariousski (talk • contribs) 22:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Note
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTag► prorogation ─╢ 16:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

See Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents — T RANSPORTER M AN  (TALK ) 16:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Removal of talk comments
You removed some comments by Atmapuri here. Please restore these comments, since there is no sign that you have consensus to remove them. EdJohnston (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The edits that were moved and/or deleted were not pertinent to page improvements. They were an ongoing debate of the subject of the article. The very first bullet at the top of ALL Talkback pages clearly state: "This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject." I will restore what was pertinent, and anything that I did remove that was pertinent I did by error, and only as was my wish to help clean up the page from one user rattling on and on about the topic, to the detriment of finding ways to improve the page. --Fatehji (talk) 16:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

AN/I notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Gatoclass (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Fatehji, unless you promise to change your behavior, you will most likely be topic banned per the ANI discussion. Even your edit summaries look like you are engaged in a WP:BATTLE to push your version of the truth regarding Kundalini yoga. We expect that our articles will be calm and objective, and we expect editors to patiently work with others on the Talk page. A large percentage of your edits, even now, seem to be reverts of changes by other editors. Perhaps this should serve as a hint to you that your changes do not have consensus. EdJohnston (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Your actions in restoring WP:COATRACK material at Kundalini yoga represent edit warring, and may violate our policy on conflict of interest. If you don't remove these changes until such time as you obtain formal consensus for them at Talk:Kundalini yoga, you may be blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 16:11, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I have edited these changes and made my defense on the Incidents boards, which incidentally was an unfair escalation after I had prefviously requested 3rd party opinions.--Fatehji (talk) 17:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

for. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Per your recent edit, which removes a well-sourced section (per WP:MEDRS) about possible hazards of Kundalini yoga. You have been warring to push your point of view about Yogi Bhajan's importance to the field of Kundalini yoga, and to minimize the existence of Kundalini syndrome. Please read and follow our policies and guidelines at WP:COI, WP:RS and WP:CONSENSUS. This case was previously discussed at WP:ANI and you've had plenty of warnings. Nobody on the article Talk page has supported your changes, and many of your edits have been reverted, so you clearly don't have consensus. EdJohnston (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

--Fatehji (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I think I'll physically fall off my chair laughing if an admin tags this 'tl;dr'... Half  Shadow  19:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna hit you... Half  Shadow  20:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Jayron. I have tried to use the talk pages, but the other tendentiously editing editors have ignored my comments, or have not responded to objective reasoning with new source material. I believe you are 100% correct that I have been guilty of a loss of patience for making changes. However, in my defense, I have shown 4 sources of 3rd opinion that side with me -- which outweighs the 2 editors who have taken a stand against me. What separates someone who is editing to rectify a wrong and someone who perpetuates it? It seems to me in this instance it depends on who levels the accusations first. I also believe I have cited all my reasoning and given proper verifiable sources, while the editors who are changing my edits and blocking me have not cited any reasoning that refutes my examples with new data or sources. That is my opinion - I am simply trying to be objective, neutral, fair in creating an equal and informative page that reflects the information and structure of other yoga pages.--Fatehji (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

3O Templates at Kundalini Yoga
Fatehji, I notice that you the  tags at Kundalini Yoga with the edit summary, "PLEASE DONT DELETE 3O REQUESTS UNTIL MORE OPINIONS ARE GATHERED." You need to understand that posting the tags without also listing the dispute at the Third Opinion project does absolutely nothing. (If you read the text of the template, it says that.) If you want a Third Opinion, you must also list the dispute at the Third Opinion project; the template is really just a notice to the other editors in the dispute that someone has asked for a Third Opinion. Asking for a Third Opinion via the Third Opinion project is different than just trying to get additional editors involved in the discussion. A Third Opinion cannot be counted towards consensus or used as a tiebreaker. If you're just trying to get additional editors involved in the dispute, whose input can count towards consensus, then neither the Third Opinion project nor the tag will do it. What you probably need to do is to make a request for comments, probably by posting the philosophy–and–religion tag (but you may like one of the other subject–area tags listed at the request for comments page better; it's your choice). If you do that, however, you may not get a response if you also have the tags posted, since people may think that you are forum shopping. There are other ways to get other editors involved, too, such as (but not only) posting on the talk page of an appropriate subject–matter project like those listed at the top of the Kundalini Yoga talk page. — T RANSPORTER M AN  (TALK ) 16:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC) (Corrected typo. — T RANSPORTER M AN   (TALK ) 17:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC))

Nomination of Kundalini Yoga as Taught by Yogi Bhajan for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Kundalini Yoga as Taught by Yogi Bhajan, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kundalini Yoga as Taught by Yogi Bhajan until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wikid as&#169; 20:20, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)