User talk:Fatfrank69

June 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of eponymous laws has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of eponymous laws was changed by Fatfrank69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897668 on 2014-06-04T17:41:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hood's Law


The article Hood's Law has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Neologism with no claim of significance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piguy101 (talk) 18:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hood's law


A tag has been placed on Hood's law requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi. I may be wrong but in submitting the article for speedy deletion, I took a guess that this "law" was coined by someone you know. If not, I'll fall back on proposed deletion or a full deletion discussion. Google shows no indication that this law has any currency in the world, and articles on Wikipedia have to be about notable topics that are verifiable from independent, reliable sources. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:03, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Hood's Law for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hood's Law is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hood's Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Hood's law. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Hood's law. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to List of eponymous laws
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to List of eponymous laws added the name of an apparently non-notable entry. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a credible pre-existing article to establish notability. If Hood's law withstands speedy deletion, it may qualify. Thank you! Jacona (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hood's Law


A tag has been placed on Hood's Law requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)