User talk:FatherTeresa

Welcome! Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 01:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

May 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Michael Kimmelman, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 21:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Michael Kimmelman. bonadea contributions talk 23:25, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Please use the article's talk page instead of simply reinstating your edits - but note that this policy applies to all Wikipedia pages, including talk pages. --bonadea contributions talk 23:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Longhair\talk 00:07, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

I see that outsiders cannot add more balanced citations to the existing article which is being protected and content must be non-critical. Still, some existing quotes are out of context and some phrases are weak and need “citation added” .... each edit I made was one at a time so they could be viewed individually, but it seems that no edits are allowed on this page? My requests and edits have been much more detailed than your reversions and blocking. Wikipedia is supposed to be for everybody, and this profile of an important architecture critic is not getting the balanced citations it deserves—including those from Architect’s Newspaper, New York Observer, and the subject’s own words that accurately describe the subject’s own approach. If you don’t like a few phrases, I’ve tried to change them. This kind of censorship is bad for the public. FatherTeresa (talk) 04:50, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

My detailed citations and reasons have only been responded to with generic sentiments about content. is anyone actually reading the content? Your one line reasons are not sufficient, especially when you make no reference to actual content.