User talk:Father Stuart


 * Hi! In order for us to help you, please can you tell us what your problem is? :-)  Stwalkerster  talk 12:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It appears that you have written the article in your Userspace, which is here. To create an actual article, you need to create it in the article space. Here is a link to the page which you need to place the article. Old Catholic Church in Europe. You can just edit that page, and move the text into it. :-)  Stwalkerster  talk 12:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You appear to have successfully created it now. If you do need any more help, just put the helpme tag back on you talk page (here) and someonw will help you as fast as possible. Sorry, but I have to go now :-)  Stwalkerster  talk 12:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Default clip image002a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Default clip image002a.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Default clip image002a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Default clip image002a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Default clip image002a.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Default clip image002a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)\\\\--Fr. Stuart 12:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)\\\\

Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 12:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. IrishGuy talk 09:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Help request
I am very concerned at the way that I have been disrespected. I will consider whether or not I'll be using Wikipedia again. I'm a new user trying to make sense of an almost incomprehensible system. Wikipedia seems to be designed for the monitors of the system rather than people trying to contribute.


 * Is there a specific situation you'd like to address? I agree with you that Wikipedia can be difficult to learn.  There are several procedures in place for resolving disagreements with other editors. --Moonriddengirl 22:08, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

I have been accused of being a sock puppet....a term I hadn't heard of until today! I'd like to delete that other identity which I set up when I first started as I couldn't fathom Wikipedia and have this identity. However, I don't think I'd use Wikipedia again. I even reset using this time to explain why I feel so disrespected||||--Fr. Stuart 22:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)||||


 * Because of copyright laws, it is not Wikipedia's policy to delete accounts, however you may ask to have your userpage deleted by placing at the top of it. User:talk pages are not usually removed. If the username you have chosen is too closely associated to your public identity, you may wish to request a user name change. This is frequently a recourse when a user feels the need to exercise the Right to vanish. If you have been the target of true incivility, you may be able to have incivil comments about you permanently removed. Several of these actions require the assistance of a bureaucrat, who has the technical ability to make changes that other Wikipedia editors cannot. --Moonriddengirl 22:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Default clip image002a.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Default clip image002a.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 18:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:2007 0303Beach0033.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:2007 0303Beach0033.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Robert and dennis1.png


The file File:Robert and dennis1.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Harewood19.png


The file File:Harewood19.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Old Roman Catholic Church in Europe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Old Roman Catholic Church in Europe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Old Roman Catholic Church in Europe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Veverve (talk) 20:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)