User talk:Fauj

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chittisinghpura massacre. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- vi5in [talk] 23:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

It's a fact that the perpetrators were not Indian security forces. The error was acknowledged by Clinton's publishers. There's no need to be dramatic. The article has been properly cited. The Amnesty International article is dated 15 June 2000, when details were unclear. Since then it has become clear that the perpetrators were militants. The Indian Express article (dated May 19, 2006) reports that Clinton wrongly said that the killings were done by Hindu militants. It doesn't help to cite an outdated source in the article when newer ones exist. If you continue to impose your POV and bias on the article you will eventually get blocked. -- vi5in [talk] 04:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Chittisinghpura massacre, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- vi5in [talk] 04:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello, regarding these two edits, , it will be worthwhile for you to go through WP:NPOV, a very important policy. We are an encyclopedia and information must be presented from a neutral point of view, irrespective of what your views on the subject may be. Thanks — Lost (talk) 08:34, 16 October 2007 (UTC)