User talk:Faulty

Drive
I noticed your edit at Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us, and wanted to add a welcome because removing that original research was a good idea. However, I see that you have been editing longer than me, so I guess you are going to have to remain welcomeless. Happy editing! Johnuniq (talk) 07:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 08:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Technocracy Movement
Please read the citation in the American governments Social Security history page about the information you are removing. If you continue to remove sourced material it could lead to charges of vandalism or worse, edit warring etc. The source for this statement is about as reliable as it gets, Though now relatively insignificant the Technocracy movement alone among the collection of radical movements of the 1930s survives into the present day,  We can not source to your opinion. Wikipedia editors are not reliable sources about their opinions. So, scroll down and read the information and the phrasing and please stop removing content from that article without some just cause. Thanks Earl King Jr. (talk) 05:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Built-up guns
I am unaware of experiments with built-up construction prior to 1876, although experimentation with Rodman guns during the American Civil War demonstrated the limitations of single castings. The late 19th century was an era of rapid technological innovation; but the cost of artillery was too great to encourage individual experimentation without government support, and individual effort toward producing such destructive devices would have been cause for alarm without some assurance the government would control its use and distribution. Thewellman (talk) 17:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

January 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 08:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)