User talk:FaustoLG


 * }

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573729977 your edit] to Erinyes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * In Greek mythology the Erinyes ; erinyes. Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random

March 2015
Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Faster-than-light with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 16:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Men Going Their Own Way
See WP:EW. It appears you are making repeated edits at Men Going Their Own Way to force your preferred version into the article. You've also been leaving warlike comments that disparage other editors. This probably won't continue much longer. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 14:59, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Men Going Their Own Way. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 15:48, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

October 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GABgab 18:24, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. EdJohnston (talk) 03:09, 17 November 2018 (UTC)