User talk:Favrice itsapoem

Music2020

Speedy deletion nomination of Music2020


A tag has been placed on Music2020 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 02:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Ok, @C.Fred I have that link open and will be making the changes as I have time this week. Let's hope the article sticks around long enough.

November 2016
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Peridon (talk) 13:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The article was written in pure PR jargon. I've seen plenty of that before, but never 'architect' as a verb. Articles on Wikipedia should be written in plain English, neutrally and clearly. Using the language of the advertising agency leads to the article being treated as advertising, whatever your intentions were. Also, most advertising people that post here claim to be fans of the subject. I have my doubts in most cases. If you are being or expecting to be paid to edit (or otherwise being rewarded for editing), you MUST read WP:PCD about this as paid editing (whether as an employee or an agent) MUST be declared. Peridon (talk) 13:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)