User talk:FawnWilson59

Hi. The content you added to Google Books is problematic in a few ways, but primarily because it is not sourced to a reliable source. Please don't add it back in. Thanks. – Steel 03:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Everything here has to be verified to a reliable source. This is a core content policy. Wikipedia is really not the place to take out your frustration with Google. – Steel 03:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm Sue Rangell. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Google Books, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Sue Rangell &#91; citation needed &#93; 03:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

What are you talking about? Lots of things on wikipedia are from opinion and personal observation. The way this google books article is written without my comments, makes it look like it's written by a google employee. Are you telling wikipedia members and readers they can't submit observations of google books, because you don't like them? The source for this is my experience and my observations, and these are 100%, and for absolute sure reliable and you can take that to the bank and cash it. Don't step on my voice.