User talk:Fayedesouza/Blastobotrys elegans/JasonZekunHuang Peer Review

This is the peer review for the species Blastobotrys elegant by User: Fayedesouza

The present article outline has all the section filled with point form information and all the taxonomic naming as well as synonym have been correctly added, with proper year and author of identification labelled. History of the species have been demonstrated with clarity, but the taxonomic characteristics of the species needs more elaboration i.e. what is iconic about the ascomycota, sacchromycetes, what led to the species being characterized into this division/class/order, were there any previous taxonomic designations that were later disproven. The growth and morphology section contains good and specific information. Physiology sections mentions some interesting points, such as the inability to to grow on a variety of mediums, some more elaborations on this would be nice (i.e. the possible physiological mechanism/limitations that prevents growth on these mediums. Habitat and ecology section would need more information to supplement. With regards to sources, all sources are of reliable academic source, but the number is limited to two. More sources to further validate the presented information and elaborate aforementioned points would be a great addition to the article. Additionally, a little coding error regarding Qnnnn, ways to address this problem can be simply found on the weekly outline (the one on writing article outline with wikepedia code). Overall a good outline that clearly demonstrates the layout of the future article, but more sources and elaborate informations would be nice. JasonZekunHuang (talk) 18:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)