User talk:Fayez95

February 2014
I am myself owner of website and copyright holder. Can you help me know how is it possible to allow you (Wikipedia) publish all information provided which was rejected recently by you.
 * The text which you deleted here along with the WP:COI notice contained the instructions on donating material: WP:DCM. But please note this is an encyclopaedia, not a free-hosting site for material about your firm. AllyD (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

I am very sorry, I am not really familiar with the talking much here. But it would be great if you could help me in order there won't be any misunderstanding between Genz Holdings and Encyclopedia.Fayez95 (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)fayez95Fayez95 (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

On references
A "citation needed" notice is not resolved by adding a refernce to the company's own site. Every claim in Wikipedia must be backed up by a reliable 3rd party source saying it. If no such published source exists, the claim cannot stand. AllyD (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Again, a company's own site cannot - ever- reference its own claims about how good it is at its business. AllyD (talk) 21:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Genz Holdings. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 21:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Genz Holdings, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 08:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Genz Holdings, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. AllyD (talk) 16:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Genz Holdings


A tag has been placed on Genz Holdings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. YSSYguy (talk) 21:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)