User talk:Fbooker1/sandbox

Article evaluation: Young M.A
Relevancy: Everything seemed relevant to the article

Some information is out of date. Three of her singles are missing, and need to be added to the page.

Many of the sentences are very long, but it doesn't really detract from the clarity.

Tone: Some of the adjectives in the article are value statements, but overall the article tone seems pretty neutral.

There don't seem to be any viewpoints over- or underrepresented. There also doesn't appear to be a debate around Young M.A, though

Links: All of the links seem to work.

Some statements are missing sources.

Fbooker1 (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2019 (UTC)