User talk:Fbryce

Re: Dino Ćorić
No, see the WikiProject Football's list of fully professional leagues for sourcing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:11, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Magic Roundabout (Colchester) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magic Roundabout (Colchester) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Magic Roundabout (Colchester) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GDallimore (Talk) 23:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: Christian Rye
You'll find that the football specific notability guideline explicitly excludes players in his situation.  A player who signs for a domestic team but has not played in any games is not deemed to have participated in a competition, and is therefore not generally regarded as being notable. If and when he makes his debut in the Danish Super League, he will become notable and can be restored, but until then there should be no article on him. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Transreption
Hello Fbryce. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Transreption, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''subject is clear - this new word. Fails WP:V and WP:NEO, but these are not speedy reasons. .''' Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 07:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Justin Duerr
I have removed the prod tag from Justin Duerr, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, please to list it at Articles for deletion if you feel it should be deleted. Fbryce (talk) 03:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Fbryce. When you dePRODded the article, your edit summary said that you disagreed with my rationale, but didn't say why. No matter. Do you think that significant coverage has been published in multiple reliable sources? If so: Do you have citations handy? If not: Why do you think the article should be kept? I humbly request that you please reply by moving this conversation back to my talk page. Kind regards, &mdash;Unforgettableid (talk) 04:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Petrie Masonic Centre
Hi LogX. Thank you for patrolling  new pages. Of all  the voluntary  work  editors do, NPP  is among  the most  important  because not  only  is it the the first  firewall  against  unwanted pages in  mainspace, but equally  important, it  is the earliest  opportunity  to  provide a welcome to  users who  are not  sure about, or who  are not even aware of our policies at  this stage. I appreciate your enthusiasm to  jump  right  in  and help  control the quality  of our pages, but I think that  with  only  170 edits to  mainspace  it would be a good idea for you  to  stop  patrolling  pages for a while, at  least  until  you have read and fully  understood WP:NPP and WP:DELETION. I know it's a lot  to  read, but  if you  do, you  would be on  the way  to  being  a great  patroller. If ever you  need any  help, don't  hesitate to  ask  me on my  talk  page. Regards, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Lexington Middle School
Hi. Your closure just  happened to  be appropriate within the rules at  WP:NAC. However, with only  170 edits to  mainspace, I do  not  think this is an area you  should be concentrating  on  yet, especially as you  are not  fully conversant  with notability  and deletion policies. There's a lot of other great work you  could be doing  for a while such  as building  content, and by  doing  so, you  will  gather the required experience on  the way. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Jack Whitlock
Hi,

You recently(ish) deleted a BLPROD notice on the page Jack Whitlock. However, although sources were added to the article, none of them mention Jack Whitlock, so the BLPROD template should not be removed. I have readded it, and since the deadline has expired, it is likely that the page will be deleted. Thanks, Benboy00 (talk) 16:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)