User talk:Fbv65edel/Archive 9

HP fandom
I know you moved the section about the theme park because someone complained it did not belong in 'fandom', but i'm not convinced that was correct. exactly what sort of people go to such a place if not fans? Sandpiper 01:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Edel, you've gotta help us
This is what Libertycookies just posted on JK Rowling's page:

"The Rebellion Begins" poster for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. Commentators have suggested that the Harry Potter books and movies encourage dissent and rebellion against authority by youth."

This is not a joke; he honestly believes this. He has been posting his own outlandish ideas all across the Harry Potter section of this site. With his unfounded accusations against JK Rowling, I can't imagine he hasn't crossed the line. I've emailed three admins to try and get help on this, but no one's responded. I can't do this by myself and quite frankly I'm tired. I've been battling this for over a week without any help from administrators and I really would appreciate it if someone other than me decided to stand up for Wikipedia's supposed integrity. Serendipodous 16:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice reply, Edel. Very civil. Very rational. I should warn you in advance, however, that it won't work. Serendipodous 18:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia New York Meet-Up
Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Meetup/NYC --David Shankbone 23:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough
But somebody has to do it. I've been doing this by myself for over a month now, with little help from anyone, and I really don't want to do this anymore. I hate having to do this alone; it makes me look like a fascist. I would appreciate help from someone (anyone!) in this; quite frankly I am astonished at the laxity the admins have desplayed as regards this guy's edits.Serendipodous 23:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't care. He's free to edit his userpage any way he likes; he just can't do that to public discussion pages. Serendipodous 23:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I've taken JK Rowling off my watchlist. I've gone to great lengths to bring Liberty's abuses to general attention, to a chorus of indifference. I can no longer edit that article. Serendipodous 08:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for photos
Awesome! Just let me know. No worries about time scale from me, the work is greatly appreciated. IvoShandor 11:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Evanna as Luna.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Evanna as Luna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:HPOOP First Poster.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:HPOOP First Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Angr 15:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Warrington - Harry Potter Film
Regarding Warrington in the new Harry Potter film; Ashley Hull was indeed cast in this role. No references on google because he is new actor; no references to Warrington being cast because it is a minor role - however is role that is referenced in the film, thus should be included in the cast.

Please inform me of what "evidence" you would require?

Ok thanks for replying!

Bigfellahull 17:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Entering the magical world of Harry Potter editing...
I'm just starting out, and I've decided to begin by helping out on the Hogwarts page. I did an 'intro' edit where I tried to tighten it up but it clearly needs more work. First on my list is doing references. I wanted to ask you though, if I should join the HP 'squad' and also if there any unusual ref. conventions for HP that I should be aware of? Thanks so much for your time! --Gingersnap Cookies 03:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for responding!
I'll read that over and get on editing the Hogwarts article. Thanks for responding so quickly! You rock! --Gingersnap Cookies 03:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 08:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Fan petition
I would argue that since the fan petition was started in response to Yates' statements, and the film is in development, as opposed to a completed film, it is notable.

Verifiability versus truth
I think we differ in our assessment of verifiability. Yahoo Movies give a comprehensive list of the complete crew involved in the film Order of the Phoenix. Their site is not edited by individual contributors as far as I know. Please correct me if I'm wrong. If they can list the names of all crew-memebers, why would the voice-actor of Kreacher be seen as not verifiable? Only because it is not an official source? AberforthD 01:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanations Edel. I can see your point. And as you rightfully say, the problem will be solved in 4 days anyway. However, I think that your being "nitpicky" as you call it yourself has more general implications beyond this article. We had a similar issue for the Brittish edition of the book "Deathly Hallows" where the page count of 608 rose suspicion because it is exactly the same as the previous book "Order of the Phoenix". People thought it was a copy/paste error by the book sellers (most notably amazon.co.uk) and the editor Bloomsbury never issued an official pagecount, unless we have to believe second hand information from people who say they have confirmed with Bloomsbury. So it was decided for that article to say the book is EXPECTED to be 608 pages. The policy you follow at the moment doesn't mention anything at all, even though there are indications the information might be correct. Why can't Kreacher be listed as a non-human character while stating that the voice actor is EXPECTED to be this or that person? AberforthD 02:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Provide verifiable source to verify your claim, it doesn't get any clearer. Matthew 01:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * What is being discussed here? The country of origin for the infobox, or the MOS on the use of english? I thought it was clear that the writing should be in British english, but that the infobox should say both US and UK as the origin of the film since the major producer of this film is an American company.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  02:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It's the same argument as before. What makes it part of which country. It has lots of ties to the UK, but the primary source of it's money is from America. Does one look at where the money for the films comes from, or where the books come from. If one looks at the source of the film, which are the books, then it would make the film british. If that was the case, would that make The Ring actually a Japanese film, since it is a remake of a Japanese film?   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  02:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Potter Changes
The one about Padma Patil was very valid so I'm not sure why you undid that.

HP
Nijel is important to the plot? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.228.165.150 (talk • contribs)

My thing is that a giant list isn't really helpful. IMDb does that, but we are not IMDb, we are encyclopedia. Same thing applies to most of the Potter film articles. They should really stand alone from book or character articles. Alientraveller 09:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Safer.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Safer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Harry Potter cast
Hi thanks to destroy my contributions to the page of Harry Potter and the order of the phoenix (movie). I understand that you do not approuve imdb for the cast but if you have eyes like all the persons that saw the movie, you'll read the names I addded at the end of the movie... Should I invite you to take the time to see the movie to understand that I am right ???

lauren shotton
who is lauren shotton? Hornberry

Emily Dale
Hey, just OOC, how is it known that Emily Dale is 2 old 2 be playing Katie Bell in HBP? Do u no how old she wuz in PS and CS?

Re: Lauren Shotton
PS I found this site about filming for OOTP which mentions Lauren, it's in Japanese tho:

http://blog.goo.ne.jp/gobletoffire4/e/873f22f5ace3d252813b4ea5a204f1df

Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
I'll make sure to use that from now on!

Michael Corner
I got this from the Wikipedia article on Michael Corner. Looking back at the article, I see a request for a citation now in place that was not there before. I have no idea where it came from. Thanks! Frickeg 02:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Harry Potter.
I'm not revert warring, the IP is. He's already been reverted not by me, and he offers no explanation for the reversions or comments in the discussion. Will (talk) 06:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 18:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)