User talk:Fcalella

Copyright issue
Your recent edit to Save Ellis Island appears to be a copy from this coprighted site. Do you think I am wrong?-- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I just joined yesterday and am editing on behalf of the Save Ellis Island Foundation. Much of the content will be taken from their website. I'm sorry but I am not yet familiar with how to cite sources and how to insert photos and how to correspond. I hope this reaches you. FCalella

November 2022
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ellis Island—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:34, 18 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I am writing on behalf of the Save Ellis Island Foundation which the the Non-Profit partner of the National Park Service for the rehabilitation and reuse of the south side of Ellis Island.
 * The information that appears in this area is outdated and grossly incorrect.
 * The edited information which I provided is directly from the Save Ellis Island website saveellisisland.org under the "about" tab. Fcalella (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The Save Ellis Island website cannot be used as a reference to describe the activities and intentions of the organization. David notMD (talk) 13:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk)  18:57, 19 November 2022 (UTC)