User talk:Fcb981

Archive

 * 2007
 * 2008

POTD notification
Hi Eric,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Oregon Convention Center Dusk 1 (edit).jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 22, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-05-22.  howcheng  {chat} 23:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

FPC discussion
This page has been started to review, discuss, and propose changes to the current closure process of Wikipedia Featured picture candidates. The need for this discussion has arisen following complaints and suggestions raised at the FPC talk page in May 2009. This time I believe we are getting somewhere and would appreciate your participation. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

FYI - possible copyvio of your work
Don't know if you added it on Facebook but one of your pics is there and doesn't appear to be attributed to you. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * haha, thanks. I actually saw that earlier as I happen to be a member of the group and was surprised they were using my photo as the profile pic. I'm not really going after copyright violators at the moment, as I have better things to do with my time. Thats not even the best use I found... In my school newspaper (of which I am the photo editor) someone put that picture into a layout attributing it to "en.wikipedia". Little did they know they were violating the copyrights of someone in the class. I mentioned that they could just attribute it like they do any of the photos I specifically take for the newspaper. ;) -Fcb981 (talk:contribs) 21:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

discussion on Commons
Hi Eric, in case you hadn't been aware that there is a heavy discussion about your licensing template going on on Commons, now you are ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 21:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Transcluded user templates with embedded license templates
Hi Fcb981,

I've left you a message on your user talk page on Commons.

Cheers, --Slaunger (talk) 13:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Rhododendron 1 Fcb981.JPG
File:Rhododendron 1 Fcb981.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Rhododendron 1 Fcb981.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

hi there
About two years ago you were told never do it again, and you promised you will not, you even apologized. That episode would have been enough for a mature and reasonable person to know that it never should be repeated. Apparently you are none of the above. So for you only the second reminder. Please never do it again. And now enjoy:

* Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?' 'That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,' said the Cat. 'I don't much care where —' said Alice. 'Then it doesn't matter which way you go,' said the Cat *'But I don't want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked. 'Oh, you can't help that,' said the Cat: 'we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.' 'How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice. 'You must be,' said the Cat, 'or you wouldn't have come here. Adventures in Wonderland

--Mbz1 (talk) 04:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2 results
Hi, because you contributed to FPC's recent review, I'm letting you know that the results of the poll have been posted. We appreciate your contributions to the first stage and hope you take part in this next step, here, to move towards implementing several changes to the process. Regards,  Mae din\ talk 18:34, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/delist/El Castillo Stitch 2008 Edit 2.jpg
Thought you may be interested to know about the above delist nomination. J Milburn (talk) 23:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Possible commons licence abuse
I saw your Spool of string.jpg image featured in India's MINT newspaper (Hindustan Times group) this morning. The only credit is "Wikimedia Commons". You can see the picture on the Mint Lounge website at http://www.livemint.com/2011/06/09213703/Identify-the-clich%C3%A9-from-the-o.html. On the website, the credit is barely legible. I understand that the commons licence requests that the author be acknowledged by name. The Mint Lounge editor's email is priya@r.livemint.com. All the best Magnusmagnussen (talk) 03:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll send them an email. Thanks for noticing and dropping me a note, and with the editor's email no less! Much appreciated, Best, Eric -Fcb981 (talk:contribs) 03:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Soy sause display.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Soy sause display.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 06:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Fcb981, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Fcb981/photos.


 * See a log of files removed today here.
 * Shut off the bot here.
 * Report errors here.
 * If you have any questions, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Air Force Memorial at NightEdit 1.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Air Force Memorial at NightEdit 1.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:CathedralRocks1.JPG


The file File:CathedralRocks1.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unnecessary downsize of File:CathedralRocks.JPG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 12:55, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Comet P1 McNaught02 - 23-01-07 Edit 1.jpg


The file File:Comet P1 McNaught02 - 23-01-07 Edit 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, redundant to File:Comet P1 McNaught02 - 23-01-07.jpg."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 07:18, 1 October 2022 (UTC)