User talk:Fdfexoex

Fdfexoex, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Removing Citations and information.
Hi Fdfexoex! I noticed that you removed a lot of my work on Wikipedia recently regarding Mega-Earth's and planets that fall into that category. I would also like to go over some statements that you made and explain them for you so you can better understand.


 * "Alien planets Revealed" is a documentary by NOVA not "just a YouTube video". The reason why I have included it in a Youtube Video is to provide an exact pinpoint of the time inside the documentary so other editors can verify that is not original research easier. My apologies I simply misread the transcripts, But it is not down for copyright, it is still up


 * "and besides water at surface would not be under large pressure unless there was a thick atmosphere" - not true if the planet's mass is high enough it would create enough pressure to compress it to a solid state. As you do notice that is why I have it linked to when Sara Seager says it. But the limit isn't 7 Earth masses (I simply read the transcripts wrong my apologies), for example Kepler-10c has water compressed in an ice form when it is so hot that Ice should in fact be in a gaseous state


 * "11 earth mass is hardly high mass". For a rocky planet yes it is as most planes >10 Me are gaseous or oceanic.


 * "why is Wikipedia using the ESI anyway". "is a measure of how physically similar a planetary-mass object is to Earth."


 * "remove ESI info which doesn't match what the hablab says". First of all I cannot confirm this as googling "hablab" does not give me anything related to exoplanetology. Second, PHL is the main source of getting up to date information these days regarding planetary habitability. Please check it out here.


 * "rm original research" Please check this link before removing the table as original research.

Although I may seem harsh right now, please check everything before you remove stuff. Thank you, Davidbuddy9 (talk) 04:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Exoplanet ≠ exoplanetology
One is an object, the other is a discipline. This was discussed previously, so please stop your obnoxious behavior of reverting so much work blindly and without expressing a bit of logic. Thank you. BatteryIncluded (talk) 20:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Don't use edit comments for debating. Don't remove well-sourced information without a discussion.
You have made an edit (diff) to the Geophysical planet definition article with the following edit comment: Those are not THE reasons and it is misleading to say they are. They are only SOME of the reasons. Don't cherry-pick only the reasons you like. Anyway they are irrelevant to this article. Edit comments should only be used for neutral descriptions of the edits. They should not be used for talking to editors to express you displeasure at their edits. If you dislike another editor's changes, start a new section on the talk page and explain your disagreement there.

You have also removed well-sourced information from the article without providing a sufficient explanation as to why you're removing it ("irrelevant" is not a sufficient explanation). You have also left three orphaned links in the "References" section because of your rushed edit. I am thus reverting your edit and invite you to the talk page Talk:Geophysical planet definition to discuss what the text should say. — UnladenSwallow (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Sub-Neptune
As far as I know, this is the same as mini-Neptune and it seems like the two articles should be merged. However, I see you originally created the sub-Neptune article after moving mini-Neptune to that title and reverting, saying "it was a mistake to move it". Why was it a mistake? SevenSpheres (talk) 02:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I see that the first cited source refers to a dense planet that might be terrestrial as a sub-Neptune, but generally "sub-Neptune" does refer to planets with a Neptune-like composition. Super-Earth describes both uses of the term (planets larger than Earth but smaller than Neptune, and planets larger than Earth with an Earth-like composition), so couldn't the sub-Neptune/mini-Neptune article do the same? SevenSpheres (talk) 03:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Sub-Neptune doesn't imply anything about composition. It just means a planet smaller than Neptune. So I would be opposed to merging. Fdfexoex (talk) 09:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Minor characters from TV show House
Hi, I just saw you recreated a handful of articles on minor House characters. Can I just ask what your plan is for these pages? They’re clearly at least too long, and most of them (imo) should not exist as separate pages, but maybe you have different thoughts about generating sources for them? — HTGS (talk) 05:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Speaking of that, is there a reason why you reverted seven of my related edits without explanation?  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 15:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)