User talk:Featsoffact

Hi, hope you read this. You are entering incorrect and libelous info into that entry and a photograph that is not appropriate. You can clearly see I am removing that while adding benefical information too. You will be reported if this continues.--Featsoffact 14:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Featsoffact

No you will not report me for making a mistake, but as you are doing this you are repeatedly removing the vital infobox and picture for the article, I am not vandalising by doing this and I am removing your invalid warning, I have removed the warning I have given you. The sunder king 14:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Please leave an edit summary to say what you are doing, just to show it isn't blanking, it was my mistake. The sunder king 14:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Please do, but make sure it is a free image with a license, or they will delete it :(. The sunder king 15:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Htdm V099 N001.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Htdm V099 N001.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Htdm V099 N001.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Htdm V099 N001.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring on Graphic novel
There are now three editors who have expressed concern about the addition of the Mr.T quote (myself, User:Emperor, and User:Surreptitiously) and you still have stubbornly refused to engage in a discussion on the Talk page to try and achieve consensus. This is not considered acceptable behavior on Wikipedia.

My offer still stands: If you will simply engage the other concerned editors in discussion on the Talk page and try to address our concerns, I will stop reverting your changes. However, if you choose not to participate in the consensus-building discussion, then any further addition of the quote in question will be considered vandalism and may result in a block. I am sorry it has come to this. I hope to hear from you on the Talk page soon so that we can discuss the issue in a civil matter. Thanks, and happy Wiki-ing! --Jaysweet (talk) 17:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Chris Bunting
Hello Featsoffact. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chris Bunting, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletions declined: Chris Bunting and this talk page
Hello Featsoffact. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chris Bunting, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Author has not requested deletion, or other users have added substantial content. The IP editor 172.206.122.100 may have been you editing logged out, but we have no way to be sure of that. If you think the article should be deleted, you will have to user Proposed deletion or Articles for deletion.

I have also declined the speedy deletion of this talk page: user talk pages are not normally deleted - see WP:DELTALK - as we need to keep a record of the conversations. You are welcome to delete most material from your talk page - see WP:BLANKING for the few exceptions - but they will still be in the history. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:39, 15 March 2011 (UTC)