User talk:Federica Mandirola

Welcome!.

I don't know if the journal you write about is suitable for an article here -- the article needs more information. S Based on what is generally accepted here, an article about a journal should    contain:
 * 1) Full titles, any earlier titles, and the corresponding dates. Make cross references from any variant titles.
 * 2) Standard abbreviations used--make redirects from them.
 * 3) publishing & sponsoring body, as well as earlier publishers & sponsors
 * 4) availability on line
 * 5) no. of articles published a year
 * 6) ISSNs for both print and online versions
 * 7) Online availability of current and earlier issues
 * 8) Open access availability, if relevant.
 * 9) Circulation (sourced somewhere--default place to get it is Ulrichs)
 * 10) coverage in major standard indexes, inclding particularly Scopus and Web of Science (Science Citation Index) . Inclusion in major indexes is the key factor towards the decision whether or not we keep an article about a journal. 
 * 11) latest year's impact factor if available, and rank in the JCR subject field(s). Include the year so it can be updated.
 * 12) any actual references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases.
 * 13) a list of the 3 or 4 most influential articles similarly, getting citation figures from Web of Science.
 * 14) External links to the journal's main web site, and, if relevant, the main website of the sponsoring body.
 * 15) The name and affiliation of the editor in chief, and all previous editor-in chief, with dates. ; since being the editor of a major journal is considered notable, an article can also be written about them. But we do not include other staff, or the editorial board.

It should not contain
 * 1) General information listing all the fields covered, unless it is not obvious from the title
 * 2) Statements of praise for the journal -- see WP:PEACOCK
 * 3) A list of those on the editorial board
 * 4) names of the staff, except editors in chief; subordinate or section editors should not usually be listed.
 * 5) Information about subscription prices
 * 6) Information about how to submit articles
 * 7) Links to the publisher's general website, or to subpages within the journal's site.
 * and, most important, it must contain no text from the web page description of the journal. That is a copyright violation, and needs to be rewritten. Even if you are prepared to donate copyright according to WP:DCM, it is likely to be unsuitably promotional.

For more specific information our WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide. As it specifies there, the best way to start is by using   the infobox journal template; but also convert the information there  to prose.  DGG ( talk ) 18:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=570542433 your edit] to Bridging Eastern & Western Psychiatry may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hagop Akiskal the Bridging conference of Tbilisi (Georgia) under the patronage of the Ministry.

Federica Mandirola, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi, thanks for your invitation. I noticed in the page CESNUR the list : "CESNUR-affiliated scholars include: Eileen Barker, professor in sociology at the London School of Economics David Bromley, professor of Sociology & Anthropology, Virginia Commonwealth University Douglas Cowan, Renison College, University of Waterloo Jeffrey K. Hadden, University of Virginia Irving Hexham, Professor of Religious Studies at the University of Calgary Reender Kranenborg, Free university in Amsterdam J. Gordon Melton, Institute for the Study of American Religion (ISAR) Anson Shupe, Professor of Sociology of the School of Arts and Sciences, Indiana University"

In my opinion it is usefull for the understanding of the professional or scientific society.

So this is my question. Why have been cancelled a list of scholars belonging to "Bridging Eastern and Western Association"?

Best regards Federica

September 2013
Hello, Federica Mandirola. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. IRWolfie- (talk) 10:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571080668 your edit] to Mario Di Fiorino may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Phenomena. Questions and Answers, Bridging Eastern & Western Psychiatry I,1, 1-134. 2003
 * with Mirko Martinucci, “The Figures of Melancholy and Mania, De Melancholiae et Maniae Figuris” ,Bridging Eastern & Western Psychiatry  2007, 1 volume 574 pages

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571085877 your edit] to Maria Luisa Figueira may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * literature, and Western colleagues with a more pragmatic and evidence-based clinical practice.
 * Phenomena. Questions and Answers, Bridging Eastern & Western Psychiatry I,1, 1-134. 2003

Nomination of Bridging Eastern and Western Psychiatry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bridging Eastern and Western Psychiatry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bridging Eastern and Western Psychiatry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)