User talk:Feedback555

February 2010
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with 4 Digital Media. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  17:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks for this information as I am very new 'inside Wiki' but use it to help me ever day externally, it's great. I only use IMDb nearly as much. I will try the signature button above and see if it works. Thanks again, Steve--Feedback555 (talk) 11:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

4 Digital Media
If, as you suggest, 4 Digital Media, 4 Digital Asia and any other subsidiary company merit their own article then you can create one. However I would suggest that to avoid it getting deleted immediately that you develop it in your own userspace e.g. at User:Feedback555/sandbox and then have the article reviewed before it is moved to mainspace.

If you choose this method then you need to address the following as a minimum


 * is the company notable? See WP:COMPANY for guidance/defintion.  Note the films produced may be notable in their own right, this doesn't guarantee the notability of the parent company.  Neither can the argument be used that says 'there is an article about company X, 4 Digital Media are just as famous'.  See Other stuff exists and WP:OTHERSTUFF


 * can the information be verified? See WP:V for detail.  References to other wikipedia articles are not good enough, there must be reliable sources quoted to support the facts.  Reliable sources excludes the company's own website, press releases etc.


 * There have been 4 previous articles on this company, all of which have been deleted becasue they failed to meet the above criteria, so you have an uphill struggle.

best of luck NtheP (talk) 12:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your advice here, it's very much appreciated.--Steve B 17:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC) Steve

Articles for deletion nomination of 4Digital Asia
I have nominated 4Digital Asia, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/4Digital Asia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 19:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)