User talk:Feizanulhaq

March 2024
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

What topics might you edit about? Would you agree to refrain from editing about companies(at least in the near term, until we see that you understand relevant content policies)? 331dot (talk) 10:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I would edit articles within some topics of interest such as sports, mma, gaming, technology. I agree to refrain editing about companies, although would it okay to complete the existing article I started, as i had already written and collected references for it ? Dragonsbreathsolar21 (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * That would kinda defeat the purpose of asking you to refrain from editing about companies, which is to make sure that you better understand relevant policies. The draft was far from being an acceptable article(which is why it's now deleted). 331dot (talk) 14:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Understood, I will refrain from editing about companies. Was the article really that bad ? It was quite short and all the points did have supporting references. Dragonsbreathsolar21 (talk) 14:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to get into that(as it will help you better edit other articles) once this is resolved, and to further that I will ask for any comments he may have. 331dot (talk) 14:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks, . As always, I've no objection to an unblock on the terms agreed above. Dragonsbreathsolar21, FWIW, I've seen much, much worse, with no proper refs and totally OTT spammy text. The problems with yours were twofold. Firstly, your choice of username, as well as getting you an automatic block for violating our username policy, made it probable that you were an undeclared paid editor, a violation of our T&C. Secondly, your text was basically "this is what we do". To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, management structure, turnover or profits. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)