User talk:Feliciaaladiachem

March 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website - I have blocked this account. Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a change of username of your current account here. The new username must represent only yourself as an individual and comply with Wikipedia's username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit. Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87". If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text   at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 16:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

renamed
unblocked. welcome back. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 21:05, 7 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you.
 * I cannot find page. Please kindly help. Feliciaaladiachem (talk) 21:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. The article you wrote isn't your article, anyone can edit it and it must conform to our guidelines.

I deleted it as blatant spam without proper sources.

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Feliciaaladiachem. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls


 * Most of your text was unsourced or sourced to unacceptable sources such as Twitter(!) or your own website


 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
 * You tell us nothing about your organisation that demonstrates notability. It appears to have no headquarters, verified membership, income or expenditure. Instead, we get missions, visions and blatant spam


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
 * Your text was basically just pure promo, eg more than remarkable; her public recognitions reveal that her, was a distinguished career of considerable import. Her enthusiasm for that next big project was infectious, and a huge component of her and the organization success. Until her death, she remained a creditable, committed and die-hard member of the organization...  serve as a message of hope not just for people living with cancer, but their families, friends, and loved ones too. With the believes that the event will galvanize individuals into taking positive action to help turn the tide on cancer...  gifted with talented and dedicated staff and so on. Wikipedia is not free advertsing

I don't know what you meant about urls in references; as described above there shouldn't be any visible url addresses
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to your own, or associated, websites
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above, or risk an indefinite block. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)