User talk:Felicitycrane

Welcome!
Hello, Felicitycrane, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
Felicitycrane (talk) 02:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * To make it easier for the reader, instead of putting all the categories into subsections you could change them to sections. So you could have definition, industries affected by dirty subsidies and impact of contemporary substation policy as the main sections. And for your subsections under the "Industries..." you could have fossil fuels, pharmaceuticals, tobacco, and alcohol.
 * You could also add a section called references/resources etc so it will show up in the contents to access it easier.
 * Looking threw the resources they all seem to be reliable.
 * The content itself seems (more or less) to stay on the topic of what a dirty subsidy is. When reading this article I had no idea what a dirty subsidy was, but when reading this it became known to me.
 * I am not a wikipedia expert by any means but I personally believe that the sections on fossil fuels, pharmaceuticals, tobacco and alcohol shouldn't have as much detail. They are extremely lengthy and aren't that important to the overall article. It is important to mention them and let the reader know what importance they have to the dirty subsidies.
 * The content is not persuading me to pick any side and I do not believe it is missing any information. The content is very neutral.
 * I really liked how many different sources you used as a group and it made sure that you were getting a bit of information from everywhere. I am going to take that into consideration when my group is making the final draft for our article. I really enjoyed the content. Keep up the good work :)