User talk:Felida97

I would like to ask you to please post a translated article for me.
I already have an article translated into English. But I can't post it myself. 58.137.32.194 (talk) 05:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @58.137.32.194: Hi, thank you for your message! Is this the article draft you're talking about: Draft:AP (Thailand) Public Company Limited? If it is, I see that there is already an article about that company, AP (Thailand) Public Company Limited, that you could edit yourself if you think something is missing. If you weren't talking about this draft, I believe submitting it as an article for creation is the right route for you to take (regardless of the article's topic). I hope this helped! Felida97 (talk) 16:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

== hello this is obamaisbestpresident and i don't understand why you edited my changes a lot of people have seen that fight and seen Holyfield won but if you ask a lot of the poulation will say mike tyson is the best and it's a fact of opinion ==

hello this is obamaisbestpresident and i don't understand why you edited my changes a lot of people have seen that fight and seen Holyfield won but if you ask a lot of the population will say mike tyson is the best and it's a fact of opinion Obamaisbestpresident (talk) 16:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @Obamaisbestpresident: Hi, you did not include a reliable source for your statement and without such a source, what you added is not verifiable information. You cannot expect everyone who comes across this claim to "ask a lot of the population" in order to verify it, which is why a reliable source is needed and why I removed it. Hope that clears it up! Felida97 (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * thank you for the feed back but it's because i seen a show that they went and ask 10,000 people and they said mike tyson so i just thought it was enough sorry for the confusion i just didn't understand why Obamaisbestpresident (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Removed necessary additions to the chess set page.
Hey, you removed necessary additions to the chess set page.

Please advise the edits was made with the authoraization of (FIDE), the regulatory body responsible for chess.

Luxury chess is an important topic not coverd at all on wikipedia and is a well searched topic (See Ahrefs/Semrush)

The external link is the correct link.

Please contact me if you need any extra information.

Kind Regards, Ohad - GandalfGreyWizard. 2A0D:6FC2:6A00:600:7534:FDA6:D4EE:1DDE (talk) 18:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @GandalfGreyWizard (assuming this is you): Hi, thank you for your message! However, just to be clear, with the sentence "Luxury Chess Sets are a popular choice among chess set enthusiasts." to the lead of the article followed by an external link to a webshop for chess sets. Besides the fact that I would call it at least questionable whether this piece of information is a "necessary addition" (and that I can't imagine why the FIDE would care about this kind of information which you seem to imply), your addition is an unsourced claim (i.e. you did not include a reliable source supporting it and the included webshop link certainly doesn't support it). Moreover, not only does the included link not support the claim you made, it seems hard to think of a useful claim that it would support, a use case in line with WP:VENDOR, or any other valid reason for inclusion (given that "web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services" are not allowed as external links either, see WP:ELNO). I hope that clears up why I removed your addition. Felida97  (talk) 16:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh,I see. I’m no official nor I’m related to the website linked… I contacted fide because I suspected this could happen due to the linking, and wanted a confirmation which the customer representative gave with no problems at all.(it is just the only chess website I found that focuses on selling luxury chess sets, and I’m pretty sure I saw a couple of stores linked to multiple articles in Wikipedia.
 * if the problem is the link we can change it to a blog of some kind 2A0D:6FC2:6A00:600:1BC:8AB8:F941:7EF (talk) 16:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @GandalfGreyWizard: Please have a look at Reliable sources to get an idea what kind of source would be suitable. Blogs and other websites with user-generated content (e.g., Internet forums, social media sites, fansites, wikis) are "generally unacceptable" as sources (see WP:UGC), so "a blog of some kind" would not work either. Side note: I think it's unlikely that a suitable, reliable source even exists as I don't believe "chess set enthusiasts" are often written about, right? (And you would need something like that since you're making a claim about the preferences/opinion of that group people.) I hope this helps. Also, please let me know pages where you "saw a couple of stores linked to" if you come across them again. Felida97 (talk) 00:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * What? It’s not about the chess enthusiasts, it’s about luxury chess sets, which is a highly searched topic “among” chess enthusiasts With no article / page in Wikipedia. Which to me seems odd. There are multiple sources I can think of who cover this topic. If the part about the enthusiastic is the issue we can rephrase it to your liking… 2A0D:6FC2:6A00:100:2C74:2907:F768:BB52 (talk) 00:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @GandalfGreyWizard: Your original claim was not that luxury chess sets exist or that it's a highly searched topic (which is a claim for which you have not provided your source either btw); your claim was that they're "a popular choice among chess set enthusiasts", so, it very much is about chess set enthusiasts (also notice how you went from "chess set enthuisiasts" to "chess enthusiasts"; those are obviously two different groups of people that not necessarily overlap completely). If you want, you can link me all those sources you mentioned and I will happily tell you whether they're reliable and what kind of claims they would support. Felida97 (talk) 00:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

EXCUSE ME?!?!
Hi there, I noticed that my recent addition of Nicholas "Lil Crack Gangsta'" Pensylvester to the "people known as Nicholas" section on the "Nicholas" page was removed. I believe that Nicholas Pensylvester deserves to be recognized just as much as any other Nicholas. It's disheartening to see him excluded while others, like Nicholas Duncan-Williams, are included. Nicholas Pensylvester has a considerable following with 20,000 monthly listeners on Spotify, and I believe he should be acknowledged on the Nicholas page. I understand that maintaining the accuracy of Wikipedia is important, but it's also crucial to ensure that deserving individuals are not overlooked. I hope we can work together to find a solution that recognizes Nicholas Pensylvester's contributions and ensures the accuracy of the Nicholas page. Thank you. Guswe (talk) 21:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @Guswe: Hi, assuming that, you added a person that does not have a Wikipedia article (you may have noticed that every listed person in the Nicholas article has a Wikipedia article). As my message on your IP talk page states: "In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline." I have doubts that this person is notable. I hope this clears it up. Felida</b><sup style="color:black">97 (talk) 23:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation
Hi Felida97 :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 12:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Australian Engineering Heritage Register
@Felida97 I noticed that you reverted my recent edits, can you explain the reason? I added a link to the "External links" section at the end of the article. That is the new ‎Engineering Heritage website having the most up-to-date information on heritage markers as I mentioned to you before. Regarding the wikilink to the program, it's a duplication of Engineers Australia wikilink and does not add value. Kazemi.F (talk) 06:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC)