User talk:FelixCat95

April 2023
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Michael Rosen, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Michael Rosen, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''The source you cited does not say anything about the information you added. The source you use needs to actually verify the information. Also, Newbon's other litigation is off-topic in an article about Rosen.'' —Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:49, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


 * As I've written elsewhere on this talk page, the specific edits which you are referring to are ones which are now the accepted, third-party reviewed, revisions on the Michael Rosen Article. The orange information symbol you have used, from what I have read, tends to imply potential vandalism. I don't think providing additional context with sources, albeit in that particular instance I neglected to provide the second of two sources I was in the process of providing, is potential vandalism. I went back to add and properly format the second source and saw that the entire revision had been removed by yourself as well as coming back to this message on my talk page.
 * Again, these revisions you are complaining about above are now the accepted revision for the page. FelixCat95 (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from further disrupting editing on the Peter Newbon article. You have been warned by two separate editors about your disruptive edits on the Michael Rosen article and I will not hesitate to escalate this if you persist. Atchom (talk) 15:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Interestingly, the edits that 'Compassionate727' complained about above are now third-party reviewed, current and longstanding (at least a week) revisions to the Michael Rosen page. FelixCat95 (talk) 16:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)