User talk:Felix mills

February 2019
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jurassic Park (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 05:20, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brahmotsavam (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:54, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Let There Be Sunshine 15:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Agnyaathavaasi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diffs: We're not interested in editors' personal opinions or evaluations, and we don't use hyperbolic language like "blockbuster", "super hit", "flop", "failure", etc. Further, genre changes should be supported by references, and please don't just mash genres together. A thriller film is a drama--there's no need to say "thriller drama".'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:34, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Wow, I just looked at your edit history, and you appear to be adding this problematic stuff on a large scale. You need to stop this. If you add any more unsourced content, including genres and opinions, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:36, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * And there's no such thing as "mixed to negative". This phrasing is shunned by multiple WikiProjects as meaningless, since "mixed" already means "positive and negative". What "mixed to negative" would then mean is "positive and negative to negative" which is just gibberish. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:40, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Felix, if you keep adding crap like this and this and this, I will strongly endorse an indefinite block or block you myself. Stop puffing up articles with your POV. Familiarise yourself with WP:PEACOCK and WP:WEASEL. You're not making these articles better, you're making them sound more idiotic. Note also that everything has a "cult following", because every work has a small loyal group that likes it. Stop misusing this. Also, stop adding unsourced, bloated genres like here. Per MOS:FILM, we only care about the major primary genre and a subgenre if warranted. These should also be sourced. Chaining together a half dozen descriptors doesn't help. We want to know what the majority of sources say, and I doubt the majority of sources call Inception a "science fiction psychological drama crime film". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:32, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Stop your vandalism
Felix, you've been constantly adding unsourced data and genres to various movie pages randomly and this is unacceptable. A lot of editors earlier warned you but you didn't pay heed to that. I am patiently explaining to you that you need to put an end to this. If you want to add data, you're welcome to add it but that doesn't mean your editing privileges won't be touched if you continue adding stuff like this. You need to understand that unsourced and incorrect content won't stay on Wikipedia, and will be undone every single time you or anyone else tries to vandalize.

Please understand this and better try to contribute accurate data and don't undo any of your already undone edits (likely to be vandalism) unless you have a strong verification/reason(s) that you must explain in the summary. Hope you understand. This is the last warning from my side. (77Survivor (talk) 13:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC))

November 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:28, 2 November 2019 (UTC)