User talk:Felixlover4ever

Hi, I'm a new newbie of Wikipedia and this is the first time I try to communicate with a contributor. I've read the guidelines, but I could be wrong. In this case, I apologize first of all to you for my mistake.

Having said that, I would really thank you for the great quality of your article. I'm working on the design of a software of PKB but not as developer because I'm not a programmer, but just on the principles, ontologies, contents and all the other conceptual elements of a PKB. I strongly believe that if you wish to build a real PKB you must know before all the underlying principles of the system: this corresponds to the strategic vision of the project, and the software developement (which of course is fundamental) represents the tactical implementation of the strategy. And to design the strategy you don't have to be a coder, and maybe it's even an advantage, because you can envision the problems from a different point of view.

One of the main problem that I had to solve was to find informations about my research. It can seems a mundame issue but in my experience it wasn't. For example, it could be quite easy to understand that I could find sources about this topic looking for "personal knowledge management". I found only one book devoted to this topic: this book is

Pauleen, David; Gorman, Gary Personal Knowledge Management: Individual, Organizational and Social Perspectives 2011

As you can see the book is quite recent, the authors are all scholars, some of them renowned (e.g. Davenport, Prusak, Snowden) and the book itself says it the only source about this topic. To come straight to the point I've found only a chapter of this book partly useful for my project, while your article encompassed and treated in a very thorough and complete way this subject. In a nutshell, I've been searching for a long time, but I haven't read such as enlightening such your contribute.

I really wish to consult all your references, but I live in Italy and I don't know how to retrive all those precious sources.

As everybody knows the quality of Wikipedia articles varies in a huge range: in my opinion your article is one of the best contribute that I've found and it shoud be presented as a Feautured Article.

Thank you very much

Guido Dati

A kitten for you!
great article on pkb, thx.

Bavb (talk) 10:49, 10 September 2013 (UTC) 

Speedy deletion nomination of Personal knowledge base


A tag has been placed on Personal knowledge base requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cs.colorado.edu/department/publications/reports/docs/CU-CS-997-05.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –dlthewave ☎ 12:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Felixlover4ever/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Felixlover4ever/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cs.colorado.edu/department/publications/reports/docs/CU-CS-997-05.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –dlthewave ☎ 12:12, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Guido.dati may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)